ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2022
Analysis of prognostic oncogene filaggrin (
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual suppression of stemness and redox adaptation in glioblastoma through filaggrin upregulation by an abiraterone-based HDAC inhibitor.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
- Radiation-induced extracellular matrix remodelling drives prognosis and predicts radiotherapy response in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- An 11-gene glycosyltransferases-related model for the prognosis of patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma: development and validation based on TCGA and GEO datasets.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Whole-Exome Sequencing Reveals Novel Candidate Driver Mutations and Potential Druggable Mutations in Patients with High-Risk Neuroblastoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Cancer immune exclusion: breaking the barricade for a successful immunotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) is one of the most common urinary tract malignant tumors. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has significantly progressed the treatment of BLCA. This study aimed to investigate the role of specific genetic mutations that may serve as immune biomarkers for ICB therapy in BLCA. Methods: Mutation information and expression profiles were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Integrated bioinformatics analysis was carried out to explore the subtypes with poor prognosis of BLCA. Functional enrichment analysis was also conducted. The infiltrating immune cells and the prediction of ICB response between different subtypes were explored using the immuCellAI algorithm. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and flow cytometry assays were conducted to explore the effect of filaggrin ( Results: An overview of mutation information in BLCA patients was shown. Conclusions:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.