Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386250›Full record

ArticleDigital health

What goes on in digital behaviour change interventions for weight loss maintenance targeting physical activity: A scoping review.

Jorge Encantado, António L Palmeira, Carolina Silva, Falko F Sniehotta, R James Stubbs, Maria João Gouveia, Pedro J Teixeira, Berit L Heitmann, Marta M Marques

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Jorge EncantadoCentro Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Performance Humana (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0542-8340
António L PalmeiraCentro de Investigação em Desporto, Educação Física, Exercício e Saúde (CIDEFES), Universidade Lusófona, Lisboa, Portugal.
Carolina SilvaTrinity College Dublin, ADAPT SFI Research Centre & Trinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, College Green, Dublin, Ireland.
Falko F SniehottaNIHR Policy Research Unit Behavioural Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
R James StubbsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Maria João GouveiaAPPsyCI - Applied Psychology Research Center Capabilities & Inclusion, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal.
Pedro J TeixeiraCentro Interdisciplinar para o Estudo da Performance Humana (CIPER), Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.
Berit L HeitmannResearch Unit for Dietary Studies at The Parker Institute Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, part of the Copenhagen University Hospital - The Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marta M MarquesTrinity College Dublin, ADAPT SFI Research Centre & Trinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, College Green, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Lisbon · PTHeidelberg University · DEISPA - Instituto Universitário · PTUniversidade Lusófona · PTUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify the core components of digital behaviour change interventions for weight loss maintenance targeting physical activity, in terms of: (i) behaviour change techniques, (ii) mechanisms of action, (iii) modes of delivery, (iv) dose and (v) tailoring/personalization. In addition, the links between these components were investigated. Methods: A literature search was performed in five electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, CINHAL, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened the identified articles and extracted data related with the study characteristics and behaviour change techniques, mechanism of action, mode of delivery, dose, and tailoring, using standardized classifications whenever available (e.g. behaviour change techniques taxonomy). Results: Seventeen articles reporting 11 original studies were selected. Two studies were protocols, 9 studies presented results for weight change and all but one showed no significant differences between the intervention and control groups. Eight studies (73%) provided adequate information on behaviour change techniques. Five studies (45%) provided partial information about how the behaviour change techniques were linked to mechanisms of action, and only one study (0.9%) described these links for all the techniques. Around half of the studies reported the modes through which behaviour change techniques were delivered. Descriptions of dose were present in most studies, but with minimal information. The use of tailoring or personalization approaches was mentioned in eight studies (73%), but descriptions of what was tailored and how were minimal. Conclusions: The compilation of information regarding intervention components was difficult due to the lack of information and systematization in reporting across papers. This is particularly true for the reporting of the links between behaviour change techniques and the other core intervention components. This information is crucial to help us understand in the context of behaviour change interventions what works or does not work, how it works and why.

Indexed as

digital technologyexerciseHealth behaviourphysical activityreviewweight loss maintenance

Identifiers

PMID36386250
PMCPMC9643762
OpenAlexW4309367076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.