Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36385931›Full record

ReviewACS medicinal chemistry letters2022

Advancing New Chemical Modalities into Clinical Studies.

Maria-Jesus Blanco, Kevin M Gardinier, Mark N Namchuk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Total Synthesis as Training for Medicinal Chemistry.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria-Jesus BlancoChemical Sciences, Atavistik Bio, 75 Sidney Street, Cambridge Massachusetts 02139, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4333-365X
Kevin M GardinierDiscovery Research, Karuna Therapeutics, 99 High Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110, United States.
Mark N NamchukDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5220-2275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery and development has experienced an incredible paradigm shift in the past two decades. What once was considered a predominant R&D landscape of small molecules within a prescribed properties and mechanism space now includes an innovative wave of new chemical modalities. Scientists in the pharmaceutical industry can now strategize across a variety of modalities to find the best option to modulate a given target and provide treatment for a specific disease. We have witnessed a remarkable change not only in molecular design but also in creative approaches to drug delivery that have enabled advancement of novel modalities to clinical studies. In this Microperspective, we evaluate the critical differences between traditional small molecules and beyond rule of 5 compounds, peptides, oligonucleotides, and biologics for advancing into development, particularly their pharmacokinetic profiles and drug delivery strategies.

Identifiers

PMID36385931
PMCPMC9661701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.