Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36385847›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Improved Prediction Model of Protein and Peptide Toxicity by Integrating Channel Attention into a Convolutional Neural Network and Gated Recurrent Units.

Zhengyun Zhao, Jingyu Gui, Anqi Yao, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le, Matthew Chin Heng Chua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. 3D spine reconstruction from a single radiograph based on GANs.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhengyun ZhaoInstitute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, 25 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119615, Singapore.
Jingyu GuiInstitute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, 25 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119615, Singapore.
Anqi YaoInstitute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, 25 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119615, Singapore.
Nguyen Quoc Khanh LeProfessional Master Program in Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4896-7926
Matthew Chin Heng ChuaInstitute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, 25 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119615, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5200-5079
National University of Singapore · SGTaipei Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent times, the importance of peptides in the biomedical domain has received increasing concern in terms of their effect on multiple disease treatments. However, before successful large-scale implementation in the industry, accurate identification of peptide toxicity is a vital prerequisite. The existing computational methods have reached good results from toxicity prediction, and we present an improved model based on different deep learning architectures. The modification mainly focuses on two aspects: sequence encoding and variational information bottlenecks. Consequently, one of our modified plans shows an obvious increase in sensitivity, while the rest show good performance meanwhile adding novelty in the peptide toxicity prediction domain. In detail, our best model could achieve an accuracy of 97.38 and 95.03% in protein and peptide toxicity predictions, respectively. The performance was superior to previous predictors on the same datasets.

Identifiers

PMID36385847
PMCPMC9647964
OpenAlexW4307645443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.