Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36385818›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Between Protein Fold and Nucleophile Identity: Multiscale Modeling of the TEV Protease Enzyme-Substrate Complex.

Alexander Zlobin, Andrey Golovin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander ZlobinBelozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8627-0455
Andrey GolovinBelozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cysteine protease from the tobacco etch virus (TEVp) is a well-known and widely utilized enzyme. TEVp's chymotrypsin-like fold is generally associated with serine catalytic triads that differ in terms of a reaction mechanism from the most well-studied papain-like cysteine proteases. The question of what dominates the TEVp mechanism, nucleophile identity, or structural composition has never been previously addressed. Here, we use enhanced sampling multiscale modeling to uncover that TEVp combines the features of two worlds in such a way that potentially hampers its activity. We show that TEVp cysteine is strictly in the anionic form in a free enzyme similar to papain. Peptide binding shifts the equilibrium toward the nucleophile's protonated form, characteristic of chymotrypsin-like proteases, although the cysteinyl anion form is still present and interconversion is rapid. This way cysteine protonation generates enzyme states that are a diversion from the most effective course of action, with only 13.2% of Michaelis complex sub-states able to initiate the reaction. As a result, we propose an updated view on the reaction mechanism catalyzed by TEVp. We also demonstrate that AlphaFold is able to construct protease-substrate complexes with high accuracy. We propose that our findings open a way for its industrious use in enzymological tasks. Unique features of TEVp discovered in this work open a discussion on the evolutionary history and trade-offs of optimizing serine triad-associated folds to cysteine as a nucleophile.

Identifiers

PMID36385818
PMCPMC9647873
OpenAlexW4307645287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.