Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36385788›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Preference of birth attendant gender and associated factors among antenatal care attendants at Debre Markos town public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study design 2021.

Abraham Negash Dechasa, Zerfu Mulaw Endale, Addisu Sertsu Gerbi, Habtamu Bekele Sime, Belayneh Ayanaw Kassie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abraham Negash DechasaDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9406-1979
Zerfu Mulaw EndaleDepartment of Clinical Midwifery, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.
Addisu Sertsu GerbiDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3921-0518
Habtamu Bekele SimeDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-1908
Belayneh Ayanaw KassieDepartment of Clinical Midwifery, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the preference of birth attendant gender and associated factors among antenatal care attendants in Debre Markos town public health facilities, northwest Ethiopia, 2021. Method: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 8 January 2021 to 28 February 2021 at Debre Markos town public health facilities. A total of 662 study participants were selected by systematic random sampling technique. Pretested interviewer-administered structured questionnaires were used for data collection. Data were entered using Epi Data version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were applied to identify factors associated with birth attendant gender preference. Association was described by the "odd ratio" along with a 95% confidence interval. Finally, a P value < 0.05 in the adjusted analysis was used to declare a significant association. Result: In this study, 644 women participated making a response rate of 97.3%. Of the total study participants, 108 (16.8%; 95% confidence interval: 13.8-19.4) preferred male birth attendants, while 232 (36%; 95% confidence interval: 32.5-39.8) preferred female birth attendants. Age (15-24) (adjusted odds ratio = 4.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.79, 12.94), no formal education (adjusted odds ratio = 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.32, 6.52), and primary education (adjusted odds ratio = 2.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.07, 5.47) were significantly associated with female birth attendant preference. A lack of formal education (adjusted odds ratio = 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.01, 0.68), secondary education (adjusted odds ratio = 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.16, 0.71), and history of assisted vaginal delivery (adjusted odds ratio = 3.72; 95% confidence interval: 1.40, 9.87) were significantly associated with a male birth attendant preference. Conclusion: A female birth attendant is preferred by almost one-third of pregnant mothers, while one-sixth preferred a male. The clients who were younger in age and lower in educational status were more likely to prefer female birth attendants, whereas those who had a history of assisted vaginal delivery were more likely to prefer male birth attendants. To have a mother in the continuum of care, it is crucial to take her preferences into account when providing services.

Indexed as

birth attendantDebre MarkosEthiopiaGenderpreferencepregnant mother

Identifiers

PMID36385788
PMCPMC9643756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.