ArticleSAGE open medicine2022
Preference of birth attendant gender and associated factors among antenatal care attendants at Debre Markos town public health facilities, Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study design 2021.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional Geographic Dynamics of Male Midwifery Practice: An Exploratory Study of the Perspectives of the Male Midwife in Ghana's Volta and Northern Regions.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Men as Midwifery Professionals: A Scoping Review.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Unveiling Patient Perspectives: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Analysis of Patient Experiences Undergoing Cleft Care by All-Women Surgical Teams.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- Factors influencing late antenatal care of Muslim pregnant women: A predictive correlational study in Aceh, Indonesia.Belitung nursing journal · 2024Article
- Toward sustainable development goals in gender inequality: an analysis of gender preferences among urban pregnant women in a Southeast Asian country.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the preference of birth attendant gender and associated factors among antenatal care attendants in Debre Markos town public health facilities, northwest Ethiopia, 2021. Method: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 8 January 2021 to 28 February 2021 at Debre Markos town public health facilities. A total of 662 study participants were selected by systematic random sampling technique. Pretested interviewer-administered structured questionnaires were used for data collection. Data were entered using Epi Data version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were applied to identify factors associated with birth attendant gender preference. Association was described by the "odd ratio" along with a 95% confidence interval. Finally, a P value < 0.05 in the adjusted analysis was used to declare a significant association. Result: In this study, 644 women participated making a response rate of 97.3%. Of the total study participants, 108 (16.8%; 95% confidence interval: 13.8-19.4) preferred male birth attendants, while 232 (36%; 95% confidence interval: 32.5-39.8) preferred female birth attendants. Age (15-24) (adjusted odds ratio = 4.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.79, 12.94), no formal education (adjusted odds ratio = 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.32, 6.52), and primary education (adjusted odds ratio = 2.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.07, 5.47) were significantly associated with female birth attendant preference. A lack of formal education (adjusted odds ratio = 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.01, 0.68), secondary education (adjusted odds ratio = 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.16, 0.71), and history of assisted vaginal delivery (adjusted odds ratio = 3.72; 95% confidence interval: 1.40, 9.87) were significantly associated with a male birth attendant preference. Conclusion: A female birth attendant is preferred by almost one-third of pregnant mothers, while one-sixth preferred a male. The clients who were younger in age and lower in educational status were more likely to prefer female birth attendants, whereas those who had a history of assisted vaginal delivery were more likely to prefer male birth attendants. To have a mother in the continuum of care, it is crucial to take her preferences into account when providing services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.