Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36385752›Full record

ReviewOrthopedic research and reviews2022

Current Concept Review: Risk Factors for Infection Following Open Fractures.

Jeffrey Coombs, Damien Billow, Cesar Cereijo, Brendan Patterson, Stephen Pinney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Circulating CD38Scientific reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Basic science and current management for fracture-related infections.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  8. Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures: A Comparison Between Fellowship-Trained Trauma and Hand Orthopaedic Surgeons.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Revisiting the OTA-OFC: a systematic review of open fracture classification studies since 2010.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey CoombsOrthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1829-6391
Damien BillowOrthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cesar CereijoOrthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Brendan PattersonOrthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Stephen PinneyOrthopaedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection following open fracture is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a central tenet of treatment is to minimize the risk of infection. The initial risk of infection is determined by wound characteristics, such as size, soft tissue coverage, vascular injury, and contamination. While no consensus exists on optimal antibiotic regimen, early administration of prophylactic antibiotics, within an hour of injury, when possible, has been shown definitively to decrease the risk of infection. Infection risk is further reduced by early irrigation with normal saline and aggressive debridement of devitalized tissue. Patient factors that increase risk of infection following open fracture include diabetes mellitus, smoking, male gender, and lower extremity fracture.

Indexed as

antibiotic prophylaxisinfectionopen fracturetrauma

Identifiers

PMID36385752
PMCPMC9651069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.