Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36385744›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023

An introduction to causal inference for pharmacometricians.

James A Rogers, Hugo Maas, Alejandro Pérez Pitarch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tutorial on Causal Mediation Analysis for Pharmacometricians.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Covariate modeling in pharmacometrics: General points for consideration.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  12. Using forest plots to interpret covariate effects in pharmacometric models.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An introduction to causal inference for pharmacometricians.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James A RogersMetrum Research Group, Tariffville, Connecticut, USA.
Hugo MaasBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Alejandro Pérez PitarchBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As formal causal inference begins to play a greater role in disciplines that intersect with pharmacometrics, such as biostatistics, epidemiology, and artificial intelligence/machine learning, pharmacometricians may increasingly benefit from a basic fluency in foundational causal inference concepts. This tutorial seeks to orient pharmacometricians to three such fundamental concepts: potential outcomes, g-formula, and directed acyclic graphs (DAGs).

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiometryCausalityConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicData Interpretation, StatisticalHumans

Identifiers

PMID36385744
PMCPMC9835139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.