SynthesisSkeletal radiology2023
Radiomics-based approaches outperform visual analysis for differentiating lipoma from atypical lipomatous tumors: a review.
Synthesis in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fat-containing soft-tissue tumors: Imaging findings and pathologic correlation.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Bayesian additive regression trees for machine learning to classify benign vs atypical lipomatous tumors on MRI.Radiology advances · 2025Article
- Multi-center external validation of an automated method segmenting and differentiating atypical lipomatous tumors from lipomas using radiomics and deep-learning on MRI.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Effects of Interobserver Segmentation Variability and Intensity Discretization on MRI-Based Radiomic Feature Reproducibility of Lipoma and Atypical Lipomatous Tumor.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- MRI radiomics-based machine learning for classification of deep-seated lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor of the extremities.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiating atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs) and well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLs) from benign lipomatous lesions is important for guiding clinical management, though conventional visual analysis of these lesions is challenging due to overlap of imaging features. Radiomics-based approaches may serve as a promising alternative and/or supplementary diagnostic approach to conventional imaging. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review the practice of radiomics-based imaging and systematically evaluate the literature available for studies evaluating radiomics applied to differentiating ALTs/WDLs from benign lipomas. REVIEW: A background review of the radiomic workflow is provided, outlining the steps of image acquisition, segmentation, feature extraction, and model development. Subsequently, a systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and the grey literature was performed from inception to June 2022 to identify size studies using radiomics for differentiating ALTs/WDLs from benign lipomas. Radiomic models were shown to outperform conventional analysis in all but one model with a sensitivity ranging from 68 to 100% and a specificity ranging from 84 to 100%. However, current approaches rely on user input and no studies used a fully automated method for segmentation, contributing to interobserver variability and decreasing time efficiency.
conclusionRadiomic models may show improved performance for differentiating ALTs/WDLs from benign lipomas compared to conventional analysis. However, considerable variability between radiomic approaches exists and future studies evaluating a standardized radiomic model with a multi-institutional study design and preferably fully automated segmentation software are needed before clinical application can be more broadly considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36385583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.