ArticleClinical physiology and functional imaging2023
[
Article in Clinical physiology and functional imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- CanInternational urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake variability in patients with prostate cancer.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2025Article
- AI based automatic measurement of split renal function in [EJNMMI reports · 2025Article
- Dependence of Renal Uptake on Kidney Function in [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Comparison ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- [European journal of hybrid imaging · 2023Article
- Erratum.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2023Article
- [Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2023Article
- An exploratory study of unexplained concentration ofFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2023
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScintigraphy with technetium-99m-labelled dimercaptosuccinic acid ([
methodsHundred and eighty-five patients underwent PET imaging at 1 and 2 h after injection of 4.0 ± 0.2 MBq [
resultsVariation in the eGFR values was explained to a significant degree by SUV
conclusionRenal [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.