Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36385366›Full record

ReviewApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2023

Biofouling in Membrane Bioreactors: Mechanism, Interactions and Possible Mitigation Using Biosurfactants.

Deepti Singh, Surekha K Satpute, Poonam Ranga, Baljeet Singh Saharan, Neha Mani Tripathi, Gajender Kumar Aseri, Deepansh Sharma, Sanket Joshi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Deepti Singh *Amity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, 303002, India.
Surekha K Satpute *Department of Microbiology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, 411007, India.
Poonam RangaChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Baljeet Singh SaharanChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, 125004, India.
Neha Mani TripathiAmity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, 303002, India.
Gajender Kumar AseriAmity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, 303002, India.
Deepansh SharmaDepartment of Life Sciences, J C Bose University of Science and Technology, YMCA, Faridabad, Haryana, 121006, India. deepanshsharma@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-2812
Sanket JoshiOil & Gas Research Centre, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. sanket@squ.edu.om.
Institute of Microbial Technology · INChaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University · INJ.C. Bose University of Science & Technology, YMCA · INSavitribai Phule Pune University · INSultan Qaboos University Hospital · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofouling roots damage to membrane bioreactors (MBRs), such as physical, functional and organisational changes and even therefore clogging of the membrane pores and successive microbial degradation. Further, it blocks the pores, results into a biomass cake and in due course reduces the membrane flux and leads to an increase in the operational costs. MBR fouling contributed to the rise in transmembrane pressure (TMP) and decrease in permeate flux (in case of constant pressure operation mode). Chemical surfactants adopted for the cleaning of membrane surfaces have certain disadvantages such as toxicity manifestations, damage to the membranes and high CMC concentrations. Biosurfactant surfactants have attained increasing interest due to their low toxicity, biodegradability, stability to extreme environmental conditions such as temperatures, pH and tolerance to salinity. The biosurfactants trapped the foulants via micelle formation, which distresses hydrophobic interactions amongst bacteria and the surface. Rhamnolipids as an anionic biosurfactant pose a significant interfacial potential and have affinity to bind organic matter. The present review discusses the problem of biofouling in MBRs, type and interactions of foulants involved and also highlights the mechanisms of biosurfactant cleaning, effect of different parameters, effect of concentration, TMP, flux recovery, permeability, mitigation practices and challenges.

Indexed as

BiofoulingBacteriaBiomassBioreactorsMembranes, ArtificialMembranes, ArtificialFlux rateGraftingMembrane bioreactorsPermeabilityRhamnolipids

Identifiers

PMID36385366
OpenAlexW4309245352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.