ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2023
A scoping review of theories used to investigate clinician adherence to clinical practice guidelines.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators of adherence to clinical practice guidelines in Germany-A systematic review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers to Protocol Adherence in Emergency Departments and Evidence-Based Strategies for Successful Implementation: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Professional role and hierarchy shape adherence to electronic alerts for laboratory test ordering.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A scoping review of the use of behavioral theories in health professionals' continuing professional development research.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Exploring pediatricians' off-label prescribing behavior in China: A theory of planned behavior-based study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Behavioural theories, models and frameworks to underpin clinical pharmacy and pharmacy practice research: guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Impact of National Society Guidelines and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines on Genetic Testing Use Among Patients with Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Evidence for return to work following complex orthopaedic injury - a scoping review.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Trends in pharmacological prescriptions and polypharmacy for personality disorders: a 10-year cross-sectional analysis of naturalistic data.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Assessing TDApp: An AI-based clinical decision support system for ADHD treatment recommendations.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- A Call to Action for Anticoagulation Stewardship to Address Suboptimal Thromboprophylaxis Practices for at-Risk Non-Orthopedic Surgical Patients in Vietnam: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
- 'How are we going to harm the next trauma patient?' Trauma care providers' perspective on potential harm to trauma patients.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- The implementation of the guideline for the management of pediatric off-label use of drugs in China: a cross-sectional study.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- Index admission cholecystectomy for biliary acute pancreatitis or choledocholithiasis reduces 30-day readmission rates in children.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Investigating physicians' views on non-formulary prescribing: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- The Treatment of Pediatric Pain in Spain: A Survey Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRoutine utilization of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is an effective strategy to optimize patient care and reduce practice variation. Healthcare professionals' failure to adhere to CPGs introduces risks to both patients and the sustainability of healthcare systems. The integration of theory to investigate adherence provides greater insight into the often complex reasons for suboptimal behaviors.
aimTo determine the coverage of literature surrounding the use of theory in studies of CPG adherence, report the key findings and identify the knowledge gaps.
methodIn April 2021, three bibliographic databases were searched for studies published since January 2010, adopting theory to investigate health professionals' adherence to CPGs. Two reviewers independently screened the articles for eligibility and charted the data. A narrative approach to synthesis was employed.
resultsThe review includes 12 articles. Studies were limited to primarily investigations of physicians, quantitative designs, single disease states and few countries. The use of behavioral theories facilitated pooling of data of barriers and facilitators of adherence. The domains and constructs of a number of the reported theories are captured within the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the most common barriers aligned with the TDF domain of environmental context and resources, fewer studies reported facilitators.
conclusionThere is emerging use of behavioral theories investigating physicians' adherence to CPGs. Although limited in number, these studies present specific insight into common barriers and facilitators, thus providing valuable evidence for refining existing and future implementation strategies. Similar investigations of other health professionals are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.