3D and cinematic rendering of abdominopelvic pathology in the peripartum period.

Naveen Ghuman, Elliot K Fishman, Erin Gomez

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

Cinematic rendering in CT angiography: a pictorial review of clinical applications.Insights into imaging · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naveen GhumanDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Russell H. Morgan, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline St., JHOC 3150, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. nghuman1@jh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-2490

Elliot K FishmanDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Russell H. Morgan, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline St., JHOC 3150, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

Erin GomezDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Russell H. Morgan, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline St., JHOC 3150, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D with volume rendering and the more recently described technique of cinematic rendering are post-processing techniques that create reconstructions of cross sectional imaging data which enhance image interpretation. This review illustrates the potential applications of volume rendering, 3D, and cinematic rendering in the evaluation of abdominopelvic pathology in the peripartum period. These techniques show promise in improving visualization of pelvic structures, vascular mapping, highlighting textural differences between tissues, and improving understanding of spatial relationships.

Indexed as

Peripartum PeriodTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedFemaleObstetricPelvis

Identifiers

PMID36385191

DOI10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.10.015

OpenAlexW4309245503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.