ArticleScientific reports2022
Robust R-peak detection in an electrocardiogram with stationary wavelet transformation and separable convolution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Survey of Data Augmentation of ECG Signals for AI Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- A reproducible benchmark of QRS detection algorithms across diverse ECG datasets and noise conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Surrogate modelling of heartbeat events for improved J-peak detection in BCG using deep learning.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024Article
- ECG-Based Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection for Early Detection and Monitoring of Epileptic Seizures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- A Deep Learning Architecture Using 3D Vectorcardiogram to Detect R-Peaks in ECG with Enhanced Precision.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
R-peak detection is an essential step in analyzing electrocardiograms (ECGs). Previous deep learning models reported their performance primarily in a single database, and some models did not perform at the highest levels when applied to a database different from the testing database. To achieve high performances in cross-database validations, we developed a novel deep learning model for R-peak detection using stationary wavelet transform (SWT) and separable convolution. Three databases (i.e., the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia [MIT-BIH], the Institute of Cardiological Technics [INCART], and the QT) were used in both the training and testing models, and the MIT-BIH ST Change (MIT-BIH-ST), European ST-T, TELE and MIT-BIH Noise Stress Test (MIT-BIH-NST) databases were further used for testing. The detail coefficient of level 4 decomposition by SWT and the first derivative from filtered ECGs were used for model inputs, and the interval of 150 ms centered at marked peaks was used for labels. Separable convolution with atrous spatial pyramidal pooling was selected as the model's architecture, and noise-augmented waveforms of 5.69 s duration (2048 size in 360 Hz) were used in training. The model performance was evaluated using cross-database validation. The F1 scores of the peak detection model were 0.9994, 0.9985, and 0.9999 in the MIT-BIH, INCART, and QT databases, respectively. When the above three databases were pooled, the F1 scores were 0.9993 for fivefold cross-validation and 0.9991 for cross-database validation. The model performance remained high for MIT-BIH-ST, European ST-T, and TELE, with F1 scores of 0.9995, 0.9988, and 0.9790, respectively. The model performance when trained by severe noise augmentation increased for the MIT-BIH-NST database (F1 scores from 0.9504 to 0.9759) and decreased for the MIT-BIH database (F1 scores from 0.9994 to 0.9991). The present SWT and separable convolution-based model for R-peak detection yields a high performance even for cross-database validations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.