Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36384899›Full record

Observational studyInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2023

The Clinical Evaluation of Third-generation Cephalosporins As Definitive Therapy for Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes Bacteremia.

Kazuhiro Kobayashi, Atsuko Hata, Waki Imoto, Shigeki Kakuno, Wataru Shibata, Koichi Yamada, Hiroshi Kawaguchi, Norihiro Sakurai, Kiyotaka Nakaie, Yukari Nakatsuka and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 68% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuhiro KobayashiDepartment of Pharmacy, Tazuke Kofukai, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Japan.
Atsuko HataDepartment of Infection Diseases, Tazuke Kofukai, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Japan.
Waki ImotoDepartment of Infection Control Science, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Shigeki KakunoDepartment of Infection Control Science, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Wataru ShibataDepartment of Infection Control Science, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Koichi YamadaDepartment of Infection Control Science, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Hiroshi KawaguchiDepartment of Infection Control Science, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Norihiro SakuraiDepartment of Infection Control Science, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Kiyotaka NakaieDepartment of Infection Control Science, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Yukari NakatsukaDepartment of Infection Diseases, Tazuke Kofukai, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Japan.
Toshikazu ItoDepartment of Pharmacy, Tazuke Kofukai, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Japan.
Kazuya UenoyamaDepartment of Pharmacy, Tazuke Kofukai, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Japan.
Tamotsu TakahashiDepartment of Pharmacy, Tazuke Kofukai, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Japan.
Satoru UedaDepartment of Pharmacy, Tazuke Kofukai, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Japan.
Toshiro KatayamaDepartment of Medical Engineering, Faculty of Health Sciences, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Japan.
Masahide OnoueDepartment of Pharmacy, Tazuke Kofukai, Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Japan.
Hiroshi KakeyaDepartment of Infection Control Science, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Kitano Hospital · JPTokyo Metropolitan University · JPOsaka Metropolitan UniversityMorinomiya University of Medical Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) may be susceptible in vitro to Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes. However, treatment with mainly fourth-generation cephalosporins or carbapenems is currently recommended. Diversification of antimicrobial agents in therapy is required to avoid the selection pressure of resistant organisms by broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. This study investigated the clinical efficacy of 3GC therapy for Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes bacteremia in a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Methods Patients with Enterobacter spp. or Klebsiella aerogenes detected in blood cultures and treated with a susceptible antimicrobial agent were included in the study. Propensity score matching was performed to align patient background bases, and clinical outcomes between the 3GC and non-3GC groups were compared. Treatment success was defined as having no need for treatment escalation or the addition of other antimicrobial agents, no recurrence, or no death within 30 days. Results The study included 188 cases, of which 57 and 131 were included in the 3GC and non-3GC treatment groups, respectively; 53 patients in each group were matched by propensity score matching. There were no significant differences between groups in rates of switching to a susceptible antimicrobial or adding another agent, relapse within 30 days, or death within 30 days. In the 3GC group, source control was associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Conclusion Definitive 3GC therapy for susceptible Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes bacteremia is as clinically effective and valuable a targeted therapy as non-3GC therapy and can be implemented under conditions in which infection source control measures are in place.

Indexed as

BacteremiaEnterobacter aerogenesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCephalosporinsEnterobacterHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCephalosporinsbacteremiabacterial drug resistancebeta-lactamasescephalosporinsEnterobacterKlebsiella

Identifiers

PMID36384899
PMCPMC10372282
OpenAlexW4309247526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.