Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36384872›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Maternal mortality in eight European countries with enhanced surveillance systems: descriptive population based study.

Caroline Diguisto, Monica Saucedo, Athanasios Kallianidis, Kitty Bloemenkamp, Birgit Bødker, Marta Buoncristiano, Serena Donati, Mika Gissler, Marianne Johansen, Marian Knight and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions to Address Disparities in Perinatal Outcomes by Ethnicity: A Systematic Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Risk of pre-eclampsia according to gestational age across three decades: population-based study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Caroline DiguistoNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-0991
Monica SaucedoUniversité Paris Cité, CRESS UMR 1153, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRAE, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1213-5693
Athanasios KallianidisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6078-1185
Kitty BloemenkampDepartment of Obstetrics, Division Women and Baby, Birth Centre Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1377-4625
Birgit BødkerNordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Marta BuoncristianoNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Serena DonatiNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-2072
Mika GisslerDepartment of Knowledge Brokers, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8254-7525
Marianne JohansenDepartment of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-4575
Miroslav Korbel1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Alexandra Kristufkova1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovak Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1216-0824
Lill T NyflotNorwegian Research Centre for Women's Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-1563
Catherine Deneux-TharauxUniversité Paris Cité, CRESS UMR 1153, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRAE, Paris, France catherine.deneux-tharaux@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-3321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare maternal mortality in eight countries with enhanced surveillance systems.

designDescriptive multicountry population based study.

settingEight countries with permanent surveillance systems using enhanced methods to identify, document, and review maternal deaths. The most recent available aggregated maternal mortality data were collected for three year periods for France, Italy, and the UK and for five year periods for Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Slovakia. POPULATION: 297 835 live births in Denmark (2013-17), 301 169 in Finland (2008-12), 2 435 583 in France (2013-15), 1 281 986 in Italy (2013-15), 856 572 in the Netherlands (2014-18), 292 315 in Norway (2014-18), 283 930 in Slovakia (2014-18), and 2 261 090 in the UK (2016-18). OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal mortality ratios from enhanced systems were calculated and compared with those obtained from each country's office of vital statistics. Age specific maternal mortality ratios; maternal mortality ratios according to women's origin, citizenship, or ethnicity; and cause specific maternal mortality ratios were also calculated.

resultsMethods for identifying and classifying maternal deaths up to 42 days were very similar across countries (except for the Netherlands). Maternal mortality ratios up to 42 days after end of pregnancy varied by a multiplicative factor of four from 2.7 and 3.4 per 100 000 live births in Norway and Denmark to 9.6 in the UK and 10.9 in Slovakia. Vital statistics offices underestimated maternal mortality by 36% or more everywhere but Denmark. Age specific maternal mortality ratios were higher for the youngest and oldest mothers (pooled relative risk 2.17 (95% confidence interval 1.38 to 3.34) for women aged <20 years, 2.10 (1.54 to 2.86) for those aged 35-39, and 3.95 (3.01 to 5.19) for those aged ≥40, compared with women aged 20-29 years). Except in Norway, maternal mortality ratios were ≥50% higher in women born abroad or of minoritised ethnicity, defined variously in different countries. Cardiovascular diseases and suicides were leading causes of maternal deaths in each country. Some other conditions were also major contributors to maternal mortality in only one or two countries: venous thromboembolism in the UK and the Netherlands, hypertensive disorders in the Netherlands, amniotic fluid embolism in France, haemorrhage in Italy, and stroke in Slovakia. Only two countries, France and the UK, had enhanced methods for studying late maternal deaths, those occurring between 43 and 365 days after the end of pregnancy.

conclusionsVariations in maternal mortality ratios exist between high income European countries with enhanced surveillance systems. In-depth analyses of differences in the quality of care and health system performance at national levels are needed to reduce maternal mortality further by learning from best practices and each other. Cardiovascular diseases and mental health in women during and after pregnancy must be prioritised in all countries.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMaternal DeathSuicideEuropeFemaleHumansMaternal MortalityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36384872
PMCPMC9667469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.