Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36384653›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2022

Isolation and evaluation of the efficacy of bacteriophages against multidrug-resistant (MDR), methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and biofilm-producing strains of Staphylococcus aureus recovered from bovine mastitis.

Fatemeh Mohammadian, Hamideh Kalateh Rahmani, Behnam Bidarian, Babak Khoramian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. mBio · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Isolation and characterization of a novelFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fatemeh MohammadianDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box: 9177948974, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi Province, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6326-8886
Hamideh Kalateh RahmaniDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8269-2722
Behnam BidarianDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box: 9177948974, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi Province, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1612-0387
Babak KhoramianDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box: 9177948974, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi Province, Iran. khoramian@um.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4962-2797
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad · IR

Funding

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad 3/53878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the major causes of bovine mastitis with significant economic losses around the worldwide. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR), methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and biofilm-producing strains of S. aureus challenges the treatment strategies based on the antibiotic application. Today, alternative or combinational treatment options such as bacteriophage application has received much attention. The goal of the present study was to focus on isolation and evaluation of the efficacy of bacteriophages with specific lytic activity against S. aureus strains with low cure rates (MDR, MRSA and biofilm-producing strains).

resultsIn the present study, two phages belonging to the Podoviridae family with specific lytic activity against S. aureus were isolated from the sewage of dairy farms and designated as Staphylococcus phage M8 and Staphylococcus phage B4. Latent period and burst size for Staphylococcus phage M8 (70 min, 72 PFU/cell) and Staphylococcus phage B4 (30 min, 447 PFU/cell) were also defined. Our results revealed the susceptibility of MDR (4/20; 20%), MRSA (4/13; 30.8%) and biofilm-producing (1/10; 10%) strains to Staphylococcus phage M8. Moreover, one biofilm-producing strain (1/10; 10%) was susceptible to Staphylococcus phage B4. Furthermore, both phages kept their lytic activity in milk. They reduced the S. aureus population by about 3 logs in cultured milk after 8 h of incubation.

conclusionIn conclusion, it seems that both phages had the potential to serve as biological control agents alone or in combination with other agents such as antibiotics against infections induced by S. aureus. However, further studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of these phages in vivo.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesMastitis, BovineMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCattleFemaleMethicillinMethicillin ResistanceStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus PhagesAnti-Bacterial AgentsMethicillinAlternative treatmentBacteriophageBovine MastitisHard-to-treatPodoviridaeStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID36384653
PMCPMC9670557
OpenAlexW4309506215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.