Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36384563›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

An update on explaining the rural-urban gap in under-five mortality in India.

Chandan Kumar, Piyasa, Nandita Saikia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chandan KumarInternational Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7644-356X
PiyasaDepartment of Public Health and Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India. piyasapayel@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-6770
Nandita SaikiaDepartment of Public Health and Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400088, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6735-6157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural Indians have higher mortality rates than urban Indians. However, the rural-urban gap in under-five mortality has changed is less researched. This paper aims to assess 1) whether the rural-urban gap in under-five mortality has reduced over time 2) Whether rural children are still experiencing a higher likelihood of death after eliminating the role of other socioeconomic factors 3) What factors are responsible for India's rural-urban gap in under-five mortality.

methodsWe used all rounds for National Family Health Survey data for understanding the trend of rural-urban gap in under-five mortality. Using NFHS-2019-21 data, we carried out a binary logistic regression analysis to examine the factors associated with under-five mortality. Fairlie's decomposition technique was applied to understand the relative contribution of different covariates to the rural-urban gap in under-five mortality.

resultsIndia has witnessed a more than 50% reduction in under-five mortality rate between 1992 and 93 and 2019-21. From 1992 to 93 to 2019-21, the annual decrease in rural and urban under-five mortality is 1.6% and 2.7%, respectively. Yet, rural population still contributes a higher proportion of the under-five deaths. The rural-urban gap in under-five mortality has reduced from 44 per thousand live births in 1992-1993 to 30 per thousand in 2004-2005 which further decreased to 14 per thousand in 2019-2021. There is no disadvantage for the rural children due to their place of residence if they belong to economically well-off household or their mothers are educated. It is wealth index rather than place of residence which determines the under-five mortality. Economic (50.82% contribution) and educational differential (28.57% contribution) are the main reasons for rural-urban under-five mortality gaps.

conclusionThe existing rural-urban gap in under-five mortality suggests that the social and health policies need to be need to reach rural children from poor families and uneducated mothers. This call for attention to ensure that the future programme must emphasize mothers from economically and educationally disadvantaged sections. While there should be more emphasis on equal access to health care facilities by the rural population, there should also be an effort to strengthen the rural economy and quality of education.

Indexed as

MothersRural PopulationChildEducational StatusFemaleHumansIndiaSocioeconomic FactorsEconomic differentialIndiaNFHS-5Rural-urban gapUnder-five mortality

Identifiers

PMID36384563
PMCPMC9670513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.