ArticleBMC gastroenterology2022
The CT-based intratumoral and peritumoral machine learning radiomics analysis in predicting lymph node metastasis in rectal carcinoma.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel scoring system for the preoperative computed tomographic diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Radiomics' Role in Predicting Distant Metastases, Recurrence and Survival Outcome in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Radiomics in Computed Tomography for Prediction of Tumor and Nodal Stages in Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics using multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with ovarian cancer using contrast-enhanced computed tomography-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The value of radiomics features of the spleen as surrogates for differentiating subtypes of common pediatric lymphomas.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- An integrative clinical and CT-based tumoral/peritumoral radiomics nomogram to predict the microsatellite instability in rectal carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- The value of radiomics-based CT combined with machine learning in the diagnosis of occult vertebral fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- The Use of MRI-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification: A Critical Review of Contemporary Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparison of preoperative CT- and MRI-based multiparametric radiomics in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The Prognostic Role of Lymphatic Vessel Density in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo construct clinical and machine learning nomogram for predicting the lymph node metastasis (LNM) status of rectal carcinoma (RC) based on radiomics and clinical characteristics.
methods788 RC patients were enrolled from January 2015 to January 2021, including 303 RCs with LNM and 485 RCs without LNM. The radiomics features were calculated and selected with the methods of variance, correlation analysis, and gradient boosting decision tree. After feature selection, the machine learning algorithms of Bayes, k-nearest neighbor (KNN), logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree (DT) were used to construct prediction models. The clinical characteristics combined with intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics was taken to develop a radiomics and machine learning nomogram. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was used to predict the stability of machine learning algorithms. The area under curves (AUCs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to evaluate the predictive efficacy of all models.
resultsTo intratumoral radiomics analysis, the RSD of Bayes was minimal compared with other four machine learning algorithms. The AUCs of arterial-phase based intratumoral Bayes model (0.626 and 0.627) were higher than these of unenhanced-phase and venous-phase ones in both the training and validation group.The AUCs of intratumoral and peritumoral Bayes model were 0.656 in the training group and were 0.638 in the validation group, and the relevant Bayes-score was quantified. The clinical-Bayes nomogram containing significant clinical variables of diameter, PNI, EMVI, CEA, and CA19-9, and Bayes-score was constructed. The AUC (95%CI), specificity, and sensitivity of this nomogram was 0.828 (95%CI, 0.800-0.854), 74.85%, and 77.23%.
conclusionIntratumoral and peritumoral radiomics can help predict the LNM status of RCs. The machine learning algorithm of Bayes in arterial-phase conducted better in consideration of terms of RSD and AUC. The clinical-Bayes nomogram achieved a better performance in predicting the LNM status of RCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.