Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36384497›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

Risk factors and outcomes associated with persistent vancomycin resistant Enterococcal Bacteremia.

Emily Fox, David Ha, Mark Bounthavong, Lina Meng, Emily Mui, Marisa Holubar, Stanley Deresinski, William Alegria

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Temporal Trends and Mortality of Vancomycin-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Eastern Denmark from 2020 to 2022, and identification of vanB Tn1549 insertion sites.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emily FoxUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Emfox@mdanderson.org.
David HaStanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, CA, USA.
Mark BounthavongUC San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, CA, San Diego, USA.
Lina MengStanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, CA, USA.
Emily MuiStanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, CA, USA.
Marisa HolubarStanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanley DeresinskiStanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, CA, USA.
William AlegriaStanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, CA, USA. Walegria@stanfordhealthcare.org.
Stanford University · USStanford Health Care · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies have identified that vancomycin resistant enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia that persists for four days or more is an independent predictor of mortality. Despite this, there is no published data to identify those patients at highest risk of developing persistent VRE bacteremia.

methodsThis was a single center, retrospective, case-control study of adult patients with a VRE bloodstream infection (BSI). Case patients were those with persistent bacteremia (≥ 4 days despite VRE-directed therapy) and control patients were those with non-persistent bacteremia. Logistic regression was used to assess risk factors associated with persistent VRE BSIs. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, recurrent bacteremia, and breakthrough bacteremia.

resultsDuring the study period, 24/108 (22%) patients had persistently positive blood cultures. Risk factors for persistent bacteremia included severe neutropenia (OR 2.13), 4 out of 4 positive index blood cultures (OR 11.29) and lack of source control (OR 11.88). In an unadjusted analysis, no statistically significant differences in in-hospital mortality (58% versus 40%; p = 0.121), recurrent bacteremia (17% versus 6%; p = 0.090), or breakthrough bacteremia (13% versus 7%; p = 0.402) were observed between groups.

conclusionPatients with severe neutropenia, 4 out of 4 positive index blood culture bottles, and lack of source control were more likely to develop persistent VRE bacteremia despite directed antibiotic treatment.

Indexed as

BacteremiaGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsNeutropeniaVancomycin-Resistant EnterococciAdultCase-Control StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsVancomycinVancomycin ResistanceVancomycinBlood stream infectionsEnterococcusGram positive resistancePersistent bacteremiaVRE

Identifiers

PMID36384497
PMCPMC9670444
OpenAlexW4309127752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.