ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
MLM-based typographical error correction of unstructured medical texts for named entity recognition.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using large language models to enhance clinically-driven missing data recovery algorithms in electronic health records.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Article
- A scoping review of natural language processing in addressing medically inaccurate information: Errors, misinformation, and hallucination.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Leveraging large language models to mimic domain expert labeling in unstructured text-based electronic healthcare records in non-english languages.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Enhancing biomedical named entity recognition with parallel boundary detection and category classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Health Care Language Models and Their Fine-Tuning for Information Extraction: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- A Narrative Review on the Application of Large Language Models to Support Cancer Care and Research.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- Named Entity Recognition in Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnstructured text in medical records, such as Electronic Health Records, contain an enormous amount of valuable information for research; however, it is difficult to extract and structure important information because of frequent typographical errors. Therefore, improving the quality of data with errors for text analysis is an essential task. To date, few prior studies have been conducted addressing this. Here, we propose a new methodology for extracting important information from unstructured medical texts by overcoming the typographical problem in surgical pathology records related to lung cancer.
methodsWe propose a typo correction model that considers context, based on the Masked Language Model, to solve the problem of typographical errors in real-world medical data. In addition, a word dictionary was used for the typo correction model based on PubMed abstracts. After refining the data through typo correction, fine tuning was performed on pre-trained BERT model. Next, deep learning-based Named Entity Recognition (NER) was performed. By solving the quality problem of medical data, we sought to improve the accuracy of information extraction in unstructured text data.
resultsWe compared the performance of the proposed typo correction model based on contextual information with an existing SymSpell model. We confirmed that our proposed model outperformed the existing model in a typographical correction task. The F1-score of the model improved by approximately 5% and 9% when compared with the model without contextual information in the NCBI-disease and surgical pathology record datasets, respectively. In addition, the F1-score of NER after typo correction increased by 2% in the NCBI-disease dataset. There was a significant performance difference of approximately 25% between the before and after typo correction in the Surgical pathology record dataset. This confirmed that typos influenced the information extraction of the unstructured text.
conclusionWe verified that typographical errors in unstructured text negatively affect the performance of natural language processing tasks. The proposed method of a typo correction model outperformed the existing SymSpell model. This study shows that the proposed model is robust and can be applied in real-world environments by focusing on the typos that cause difficulties in analyzing unstructured medical text.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.