Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36384430›Full record

ReviewPathogens and global health2023

Applicability of the Mexican ovitrap system for Aedes vector surveillance in Colombia.

Eduardo Wright, Maria Angelica Carrillo, David Matamoros, Rocío Cárdenas Sanchez, Johanna Yañez, Giusseppe Di Lorenzo, Juan Manuel Villa, Axel Kroeger

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens and global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06268691 (Control of Aedes Breeding Sites With a Dual-action Insecticidal Coating is Effective in Reducing Dengue Transmission), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06268691 nacompletednot on this map

Control of Aedes Breeding Sites With a Dual-action Insecticidal Coating is Effective in Reducing Dengue Transmission: Cluster-randomised Controlled Trial Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRocio Cardenas SanchezRan2019 to 2023Enrolled35,000ConditionsDengue, Vector Borne Diseases, Arbovirus Infections, ZikaArmsInsecticide Coating INESFLY
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Eduardo WrightCentre for Medicine and Society, Master Programme Global Urban Health, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg in Breisgau, Germany.
Maria Angelica CarrilloCentre for Medicine and Society, Master Programme Global Urban Health, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg in Breisgau, Germany.
David MatamorosInternational Training Centre, International Master of Science in Rural Development, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Rocío Cárdenas SanchezDepartamento de Control de Vectores, Instituto Departamental Norte de Santander, Cúcuta, Colombia.
Johanna YañezDepartamento de Control de Vectores, Instituto Departamental Norte de Santander, Cúcuta, Colombia.
Giusseppe Di LorenzoConsultorio de Medicina General, Centro Médico Familiar Di Lorenzo, El Triunfo, Ecuador.
Juan Manuel VillaDireccion de Hospitales, Secretaria de Salud del Estado de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.
Axel KroegerCentre for Medicine and Society, Master Programme Global Urban Health, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg in Breisgau, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DEUniversidad del Norte · COGhent University · BESecretaria de Salud · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovitraps can detect Aedes vectors at an early stage and can serve as an alarm indicator for outbreak prediction. This study aimed to summarize the available literature about the ovitrap system and to determine its feasibility, required resources and costs when installing and maintaining this vector surveillance system in the municipality of Los Patios, Colombia. A scoping review to assess the role of ovitraps as a tool for Aedes vector surveillance was conducted. The subsequent fieldwork consisted of mapping the municipality, manufacturing, and installing 40 ovitraps in 10 blocks, revising them weekly for 4 weeks by two half-time employed vector control technicians, and carrying out a cost analysis. A total of 38 studies were included in this review showing that ovitraps had a better performance than other entomological surveillance methods and a positive correlation with other entomological and disease variables. From the field results over 4 weeks, a high proportion of positive ovitraps (80%, 90%, 75%, 97.5%) and positive blocks (100%) as well as a good acceptance by house owners (76.9%), were identified. Operational indicators such as average installation time of the ovitraps (10h15 m), weekly reading and reinstallation (on average 7h27 m) and the cost of the intervention (COL$1,142,304.47/US$297) were calculated. Literature shows that ovitraps are sensitive to detect the presence of Aedes mosquitoes, providing data efficiently and timely for outbreak prediction. The field testing showed it is an affordable and feasible method in the context of a Colombian municipality and similar endemic areas.

Indexed as

AedesDengueAnimalsColombiaHumansMosquito ControlMosquito Vectorschikungunyadengue feverOvitrapvector-borne diseasevector surveillanceZika

Identifiers

PMID36384430
PMCPMC10392324
OpenAlexW4309247149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.