ArticleRNA biology2022
On the predictibility of A-minor motifs from their local contexts.
Article in RNA biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring GNRA tetraloop-like motifs in nucleic acid 3D structures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive survey of long-range tertiary interactions and motifs in non-coding RNA structures.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the importance of the structural context in the formation of a type I/II A-minor motif. This very frequent structural motif has been shown to be important in the spatial folding of RNA molecules. We developed an automated method to classify A-minor motif occurrences according to their 3D context similarities, and we used a graph approach to represent both the structural A-minor motif occurrences and their classes at different scales. This approach leads us to uncover new subclasses of A-minor motif occurrences according to their local 3D similarities. The majority of classes are composed of homologous occurrences, but some of them are composed of non-homologous occurrences. The different classifications we obtain allow us to better understand the importance of the context in the formation of A-minor motifs. In a second step, we investigate how much knowledge of the context around an A-minor motif can help to infer its presence (and position). More specifically, we want to determine what kind of information, contained in the structural context, can be useful to characterize and predict A-minor motifs. We show that, for some A-minor motifs, the topology combined with a sequence signal is sufficient to predict the presence and the position of an A-minor motif occurrence. In most other cases, these signals are not sufficient for predicting the A-minor motif, however we show that they are good signals for this purpose. All the classification and prediction pipelines rely on automated processes, for which we describe the underlying algorithms and parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.