ArticlePerception2023
Opposing aftereffects between a White male face set and a diverse face set.
Article in Perception, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opposing aftereffects have been observed for faces categorized by gender, race, and age. In order to form opposing aftereffects, it appears that the two face sets must be both physically distinct and differ in terms of social meaning. The current study tests whether (1) a face set that is diverse with respect to sex and race can produce a coherent aftereffect and (2) whether this diversity itself is socially meaningful enough to support opposing aftereffects. Participants adapted to a homogenous face set consisting of only White male Republican congressmen and a diverse face set consisting of White, Asian, Black, and Latino male and female Democratic congress members. Opposing aftereffects were observed: participants adapted simultaneously and in opposite directions to the face sets. These results are the first evidence of adaptation to a face set that varies based on race and sex, and the first evidence of diversity being perceived as a socially meaningful category marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.