Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36384222›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2023

The effect of multi-material architecture on the ex vivo osteochondral integration of bioprinted constructs.

Matthew L Bedell, Ziwen Wang, Katie J Hogan, Angelica L Torres, Hannah A Pearce, Letitia K Chim, K Jane Grande-Allen, Antonios G Mikos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew L BedellDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Ziwen WangDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Katie J HoganDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Angelica L TorresDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Hannah A PearceDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Letitia K ChimDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
K Jane Grande-AllenDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Antonios G MikosDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA; NIBIB/NIH Center for Engineering Complex Tissues, USA. Electronic address: mikos@rice.edu.

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB023833 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FISHER, JOHN P · 2017 to 2021
$6.2M
3D-Printed Demineralized Bone Matrix Hydrogels for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Regeneration.F31DE030333 · NIDCR · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI HOGAN, KATIE · 2020 to 2022
$141k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023833NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE030333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrusion bioprinted constructs for osteochondral tissue engineering were fabricated to study the effect of multi-material architecture on encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells' tissue-specific matrix deposition and integration into an ex vivo porcine osteochondral explant model. Two extrusion fiber architecture groups with differing transition regions and degrees of bone- and cartilage-like bioink mixing were employed. The gradient fiber (G-Fib) architecture group showed an increase in chondral integration over time, 18.5 ± 0.7 kPa on Day 21 compared to 9.6 ± 1.6 kPa on Day 1 for the required peak push-out force, and the segmented fiber (S-Fib) architecture group did not, which corresponded to the increase in sulfated glycosaminoglycan deposition noted only in the G-Fib group and the staining for cellularity and tissue-specific matrix deposition at the fiber-defect boundary. Conversely, the S-Fib architecture was associated with significant mineralization over time, but the G-Fib architecture was not. Notably, both fiber groups also had similar chondral integration as a re-inserted osteochondral tissue control. While architecture did dictate differences in the cells' responses to their environment, architecture was not shown to distinguish a statistically significant difference in tissue integration via fiber push-out testing within a given time point or explant region. Use of this three-week osteochondral model demonstrates that these bioink formulations support the fabrication of cell-laden constructs that integrate into explanted tissue as capably as natural tissue and encapsulate osteochondral matrix-producing cells, and it also highlights the important role that spatial architecture plays in the engineering of multi-phasic tissue environments. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Here, an ex vivo model was used to interrogate fundamental questions about the effect of multi-material scaffold architectural choices on osteochondral tissue integration. Cell-encapsulating constructs resembling stratified osteochondral tissue were 3D printed with architecture consisting of either gradient transitions or segmented transitions between the bone-like and cartilage-like bioink regions. The printed constructs were assessed alongside re-inserted natural tissue plugs via mechanical tissue integration push-out testing, biochemical assays, and histology. Differences in osteochondral matrix deposition were observed based on architecture, and both printed groups demonstrated cartilage integration similar to the native tissue plug group. As 3D printing becomes commonplace within biomaterials and tissue engineering, this work illustrates critical 3D co-culture interactions and demonstrates the importance of considering architecture when interpreting the results of studies utilizing spatially complex, multi-material scaffolds.

Indexed as

BioprintingMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCartilageHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalSwineTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBioinksBioprintingExplantExtrusionGradienthMSCMulti-materialOsteochondralTissue integration

Identifiers

PMID36384222
PMCPMC9805529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.