Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36384086›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

Responsive social support serves important functions in clinical communication: Translating perspectives from relationship science to improve cancer clinical interactions.

Laura A Dwyer, Ronald M Epstein, Brooke C Feeney, Irene V Blair, Niall Bolger, Rebecca A Ferrer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Laura A DwyerCape Fox Facilities Services, Manassas, VA, USA. Electronic address: laura.dwyer@nih.gov.
Ronald M EpsteinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Brooke C FeeneyDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Irene V BlairDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Niall BolgerDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Rebecca A FerrerBasic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Carnegie Mellon University · USColumbia University · USNational Institutes of Health · USNaval Facilities Engineering Systems Command · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-clinician interactions are critical to patient-centered care, including in cancer care contexts which are often defined by multiple patient-clinician interactions over an extended period. Research on these dyadic interactions has been guided by perspectives in clinical communication science, but the study of clinical communication has not been fully integrated with perspectives on interpersonal interactions from relationship science research. An overlapping concept in both fields is the concept of responsive socialsupport. In this article, we discuss responsiveness as a concept that offers opportunities for connections between these two disciplines. Next, we focus on how relationship science can be applied to research in clinical settings. We discuss how three areas of relationship science define responsiveness and have potential for extension to clinical communication: (1) (in)visibility of social support, (2) attachment orientations, and (3) shared meaning systems. We also discuss how social biases can impede responsiveness and suggest research avenues to develop ideas and understand potential challenges in connecting these two fields. Many opportunities exist for interdisciplinary theory development that can generate momentum in understanding interpersonal processes in cancer care.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSocial SupportCommunicationHumansInterpersonal RelationsPatient-Centered CareCancerCommunicationPatient-clinician communicationRelationshipsResponsivenessSocial support

Identifiers

PMID36384086
PMCPMC9722606
OpenAlexW4308464273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.