ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022
Ensembles of knowledge graph embedding models improve predictions for drug discovery.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- A dual-branch graph neural network architecture for drug-target binding affinity prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Systematic discovery of disease-modifying targets by prediction from knowledge graph-based AI model and experimental validation: Parkinson's disease case.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Bind: large-scale biological interaction network discovery through knowledge graph-driven machine learning.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Understanding ecological systems using knowledge graphs: an application to highly pathogenic avian influenza.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Hybrid Explainable Artificial Intelligence Models for Targeted Metabolomics Analysis of Diabetic Retinopathy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and Knowledge Graph Embedding Models (KGEMs) have led to their adoption in a broad range of fields and applications. The current publishing system in machine learning requires newly introduced KGEMs to achieve state-of-the-art performance, surpassing at least one benchmark in order to be published. Despite this, dozens of novel architectures are published every year, making it challenging for users, even within the field, to deduce the most suitable configuration for a given application. A typical biomedical application of KGEMs is drug-disease prediction in the context of drug discovery, in which a KGEM is trained to predict triples linking drugs and diseases. These predictions can be later tested in clinical trials following extensive experimental validation. However, given the infeasibility of evaluating each of these predictions and that only a minimal number of candidates can be experimentally tested, models that yield higher precision on the top prioritized triples are preferred. In this paper, we apply the concept of ensemble learning on KGEMs for drug discovery to assess whether combining the predictions of several models can lead to an overall improvement in predictive performance. First, we trained and benchmarked 10 KGEMs to predict drug-disease triples on two independent biomedical KGs designed for drug discovery. Following, we applied different ensemble methods that aggregate the predictions of these models by leveraging the distribution or the position of the predicted triple scores. We then demonstrate how the ensemble models can achieve better results than the original KGEMs by benchmarking the precision (i.e., number of true positives prioritized) of their top predictions. Lastly, we released the source code presented in this work at https://github.com/enveda/kgem-ensembles-in-drug-discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.