Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36383918›Full record

ArticleJournal of addiction medicine

HIV Exposure Prophylaxis Delivery in a Low-barrier Substance Use Disorder Bridge Clinic during a Local HIV Outbreak at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Hannan M Braun, Chelsea Walter, Natalija Farrell, Katie B Biello, Jessica L Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannan M BraunDepartment of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA (HMB, CW); Addiction Medicine Fellowship, Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI (HMB); Department of Pharmacy, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA (NF); Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (NF); Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University, Providence, RI (KBB); Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (KBB); Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (KBB); The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA (KBB); and Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (JLT).
Chelsea Walter
Natalija Farrell
Katie B Biello
Jessica L Taylor

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
Efficacy of a community-based PrEP uptake intervention for people who inject drugs in the US NortheastR01DA051849 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BAZZI, ANGELA ROBERTSON, BIELLO, KATIE BROOKS · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeople who inject drugs (PWID) may experience high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk and inadequate access to biomedical HIV prevention. Emerging data support integrating HIV post-exposure and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PEP, PrEP) into services already accessed by PWID. We describe PEP/PrEP eligibility and receipt in a low-barrier substance use disorder bridge clinic located in an area experiencing an HIV outbreak among PWID at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsRetrospective chart review of new patients at a substance use disorder bridge clinic in Boston, MA (January 15, 2020-May 15, 2020) to determine rates of PEP/PrEP eligibility and prescribing.

resultsAmong 204 unique HIV-negative patients, 85.7% were assessed for injection-related and 23.0% for sexual HIV risk behaviors. Overall, 55/204 (27.0%) met CDC criteria for HIV exposure prophylaxis, including 7/204 (3.4%) for PEP and 48/204 (23.5%) for PrEP. Four of 7 PEP-eligible patients were offered PEP and all 4 were prescribed PEP. Thirty-two of 48 PrEP eligible patients were offered PrEP, and 7/48 (14.6%) were prescribed PrEP. Additionally, 6 PWID were offered PrEP who lacked formal CDC criteria.

conclusionsBridge clinics patients have high rates of PEP/PrEP eligibility. The majority of patients with identified eligibility were offered PEP/PrEP, suggesting that upstream interventions that increase HIV risk assessment may support programs in initiating PEP/PrEP care. Additional work is needed to understand why patients declined PEP/PrEP. PrEP offers to PWID who did not meet CDC criteria also suggested provider concern regarding the sensitivity of CDC criteria among PWID. Overall, bridge clinics offer a potential opportunity to increase biomedical HIV prevention service delivery.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsCOVID-19HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSubstance Abuse, IntravenousHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID36383918
PMCPMC9653062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.