Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36383807›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2022

Primary health care organization in the Covid-19 pandemic: scoping review.

Breno Ribeiro Gonçalves da Silva, Ana Paula de Vechi Corrêa, Sílvia Carla da Silva André Uehara

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Breno Ribeiro Gonçalves da SilvaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos. Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde. Departamento de Enfermagem. Graduação em Enfermagem. São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8121-8962
Ana Paula de Vechi CorrêaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos. Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde. Departamento de Enfermagem. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9098-3594
Sílvia Carla da Silva André UeharaUniversidade Federal de São Carlos. Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde. Departamento de Enfermagem. São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0236-5025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMapping available scientific evidence on the organization of primary health care services and professionals during the Covid-19 pandemic.

methodsThis is a scoping review that followed the Joanna Briggs Institute method. Articles published in Portuguese, Spanish, and English from January 2020 to January 2021 in the CINAHL, Lilacs, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were included.

resultsWe selected 24 articles that presented the reorganization of primary health care services and professionals to care suspected or confirmed Covid-19 cases. Coordination measures to tackle this disease in primary health care help to control its infection, especially by the active search for respiratory symptoms, the detection of new cases, and the monitoring of confirmed cases.

conclusionThis study presents an overview of how primary health care services and professionals organized themselves to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic, addressing adjustments in infrastructure and care flows, such as establishing specific Covid-19 care units, separating infected and non-infected patients, using telemedicine as an alternative modality of care, and monitoring cases by applications and phone.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineBrazilHumansPandemicsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID36383807
PMCPMC9635848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.