Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36383635›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Perceptions of, and Obstacles to, SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Among Adults in Lebanon: Cross-sectional Online Survey.

Nadeem Elias Abou-Arraj, Diana Maddah, Vanessa Buhamdan, Roua Abbas, Nadine Kamel Jawad, Fatima Karaki, Nael H Alami, Pascal Geldsetzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nadeem Elias Abou-Arraj *School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9055-0318
Diana Maddah *School of Health Sciences, Modern University for Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3249-8854
Vanessa BuhamdanSchool of Health Sciences, Modern University for Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-1147
Roua AbbasSchool of Health Sciences, Modern University for Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9743-1875
Nadine Kamel JawadDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0325-5319
Fatima Karaki *Refugee and Asylum Seeker Health Initiative (RAHI), Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9187-340X
Nael H Alami *School of Health Sciences, Modern University for Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1802-8250
Pascal Geldsetzer *Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-5505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic is an additional burden on Lebanon's fragmented health care system and adds to its ongoing political, economic, and refugee crises. Vaccination is an important means of reducing the impact of the pandemic.

objectiveOur study's aims were to (1) assess the prevalences of intention to vaccinate and vaccine hesitancy in Lebanon; (2) determine how vaccine hesitancy in Lebanon varies by sociodemographic, economic, and geographic characteristics; and (3) understand individuals' motivations for vaccinating as well as concerns and obstacles to vaccination.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study from January 29, 2021, to March 11, 2021, using an online questionnaire of open- and closed-ended questions in Arabic via convenience "snowball" sampling to assess the perceptions of adults residing in Lebanon.

resultsOf the 1185 adults who participated in the survey, 46.1% (95% CI: 43.2%-49.0%) intended to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine when available to them, 19.0% (95% CI 16.8%-21.4%) indicated they would not, and 34.0% (95% CI 31.3%-36.8%) were unsure (with an additional 0.9% skipping this question). The most common reasons for hesitancy were concerns about safety, limited testing, side effects, and efficacy. Top motivations for vaccinating were to protect oneself, protect one's family and the public, and end the pandemic. Despite financial hardships in Lebanon, barriers to vaccine access were not frequently described as concerns. Established health care facilities, rather than new temporary vaccination centers, were most frequently selected as preferred vaccination sites.

conclusionsVaccine hesitancy appears to be high in Lebanon. Disseminating clear, consistent, evidence-based safety and efficacy information on vaccines may help reduce vaccine hesitancy, especially among the large proportion of adults who appear to be unsure about (rather than opposed to) vaccination.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19health care systemLebanonmisinformationpublic healthSARS-CoV-2vaccinationvaccine acceptancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36383635
PMCPMC9762140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.