Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36383634›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Impact of Telehealth on the Delivery of Prenatal Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study of the Barriers and Opportunities to Improve Health Care Communication in Discussions About Pregnancy and Prenatal Genetic Testing.

Caitlin G Craighead, Christina Collart, Richard Frankel, Susannah Rose, Anita D Misra-Hebert, Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds, Marsha Michie, Edward Chien, Marissa Coleridge, Oluwatosin Goje and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin G CraigheadObstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-0200
Christina CollartObstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3035-5104
Richard FrankelResearch Innovation and Education, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-4506
Susannah RoseCenter for Patience Experience, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5895-7460
Anita D Misra-HebertDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3079-7025
Brownsyne Tucker EdmondsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-4440
Marsha MichieDepartment of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6631-828X
Edward ChienObstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3268-0111
Marissa ColeridgeObstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-0050
Oluwatosin GojeObstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7057-6580
Angela C RanziniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9245-520X
Ruth M FarrellObstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8258-8842
Cleveland Clinic · USCase Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USMetroHealth · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought significant changes in health care, specifically the accelerated use of telehealth. Given the unique aspects of prenatal care, it is important to understand the impact of telehealth on health care communication and quality, and patient satisfaction. This mixed methods study examined the challenges associated with the rapid and broad implementation of telehealth for prenatal care delivery during the pandemic.

objectiveIn this study, we examined patients' perspectives, preferences, and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the aim of supporting the development of successful models to serve the needs of pregnant patients, obstetric providers, and health care systems during this time.

methodsPregnant patients who received outpatient prenatal care in Cleveland, Ohio participated in in-depth interviews and completed the Coronavirus Perinatal Experiences-Impact Survey (COPE-IS) between January and December 2021. Transcripts were coded using NVivo 12, and qualitative analysis was used, an approach consistent with the grounded theory. Quantitative data were summarized and integrated during analysis.

resultsThematic saturation was achieved with 60 interviews. We learned that 58% (35/60) of women had telehealth experience prior to their current pregnancy. However, only 8% (5/60) of women had used both in-person and virtual visits during this pregnancy, while the majority (54/60, 90%) of women participated in only in-person visits. Among 59 women who responded to the COPE-IS, 59 (100%) felt very well supported by their provider, 31 (53%) were moderately to highly concerned about their child's health, and 17 (29%) reported that the single greatest stress of COVID-19 was its impact on their child. Lead themes focused on establishing patient-provider relationships that supported shared decision-making, accessing the information needed for shared decision-making, and using technology effectively to foster discussions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Key findings indicated that participants felt in-person visits were more personal, established greater rapport, and built better trust in the patient-provider relationship as compared to telehealth visits. Further, participants felt they could achieve a greater dialogue and ask more questions regarding time-sensitive information, including prenatal genetic testing information, through an in-person visit. Finally, privacy concerns arose if prenatal genetic testing or general pregnancy conversations were to take place outside of the health care facility.

conclusionsWhile telehealth was recognized as an option to ensure timely access to prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic, it also came with multiple challenges for the patient-provider relationship. These findings highlighted the barriers and opportunities to achieve effective and patient-centered communication with the continued integration of telehealth in prenatal care delivery. It is important to address the unique needs of this population during the pandemic and as health care increasingly adopts a telehealth model.

Indexed as

access to health careCOVID-19health care communicationpregnancyprenatal health care deliverytelehealth

Identifiers

PMID36383634
PMCPMC9728023
OpenAlexW4309159258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.