Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36383565›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2022

Predictable and stable epimutations induced during clonal plant propagation with embryonic transcription factor.

Anjar Tri Wibowo, Javier Antunez-Sanchez, Alexander Dawson, Jonathan Price, Cathal Meehan, Travis Wrightsman, Maximillian Collenberg, Ilja Bezrukov, Claude Becker, Moussa Benhamed and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genome degradation in plant tissue culture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Anjar Tri WibowoSchool of Life Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3961-0263
Javier Antunez-SanchezSchool of Life Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7485-7061
Alexander DawsonSchool of Life Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Jonathan PriceSchool of Life Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Cathal MeehanSchool of Life Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Travis WrightsmanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0904-6473
Maximillian CollenbergDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1573-1888
Ilja BezrukovDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0420-4329
Claude BeckerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3406-4670
Moussa BenhamedUniversité Paris-Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National De La Recherche Agronomique, University of Évry, Institute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), Orsay, France.
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tubingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2114-7963
Jose Gutierrez-MarcosSchool of Life Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5441-9080
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DEUniversity of Warwick · GBAirlangga University · IDUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L003023/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N00194X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N005279/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P02601X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clonal propagation is frequently used in commercial plant breeding and biotechnology programs because it minimizes genetic variation, yet it is not uncommon to observe clonal plants with stable phenotypic changes, a phenomenon known as somaclonal variation. Several studies have linked epigenetic modifications induced during regeneration with this newly acquired phenotypic variation. However, the factors that determine the extent of somaclonal variation and the molecular changes underpinning this process remain poorly understood. To address this gap in our knowledge, we compared clonally propagated Arabidopsis thaliana plants derived from somatic embryogenesis using two different embryonic transcription factors- RWP-RK DOMAIN-CONTAINING 4 (RKD4) or LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) and from two epigenetically distinct founder tissues. We found that both the epi(genetic) status of the explant and the regeneration protocol employed play critical roles in shaping the molecular and phenotypic landscape of clonal plants. Phenotypic variation in regenerated plants can be largely explained by the inheritance of tissue-specific DNA methylation imprints, which are associated with specific transcriptional and metabolic changes in sexual progeny of clonal plants. For instance, regenerants were particularly affected by the inheritance of root-specific epigenetic imprints, which were associated with an increased accumulation of salicylic acid in leaves and accelerated plant senescence. Collectively, our data reveal specific pathways underpinning the phenotypic and molecular variation that arise and accumulate in clonal plant populations.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID36383565
PMCPMC9731469
OpenAlexW4309135050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.