ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Brain connectivity meets reservoir computing.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human cortical networks trade communication efficiency for computational reliability.Science advances · 2026Article
- Neuromorphic tissues: Soft biomolecular networks for brain-inspired temporal computing.Science advances · 2026Article
- Neuromorphic hierarchical modular reservoirs.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A novel framework for expanding RNNs with biophysical detail to solve cognitive tasks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Evolving reservoir computers reveal bidirectional coupling between predictive power and emergent dynamics.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Beyond networks: Toward adaptive models of biological complexity.Physics of life reviews · 2026Review
- Effects of external body vibrations on cognitive performance through brain-cardio-respiratory dynamics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A dynamical systems framework for precision psychiatry.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Connectomes inform function: from time-varying dynamics to animal behaviour.Natural computing · 2025Article
- TheBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Computational memory capacity predicts aging and cognitive decline.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Simulating the impact of white matter connectivity on processing time scales using brain network models.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Novel efficient reservoir computing methodologies for regular and irregular time series classification.Nonlinear dynamics · 2025Article
- Emergence of brain-inspired small-world spiking neural network through neuroevolution.iScience · 2024Article
- Reservoir computing using self-sustained oscillations in a locally connected neural network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Precise Traits from Sloppy Components: Perception and the Origin of Phenotypic Response.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A biomarker discovery framework for childhood anxiety.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Systematic perturbation of an artificial neural network: A step towards quantifying causal contributions in the brain.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The connectivity of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) is different from the one observed in Biological Neural Networks (BNNs). Can the wiring of actual brains help improve ANNs architectures? Can we learn from ANNs about what network features support computation in the brain when solving a task? At a meso/macro-scale level of the connectivity, ANNs' architectures are carefully engineered and such those design decisions have crucial importance in many recent performance improvements. On the other hand, BNNs exhibit complex emergent connectivity patterns at all scales. At the individual level, BNNs connectivity results from brain development and plasticity processes, while at the species level, adaptive reconfigurations during evolution also play a major role shaping connectivity. Ubiquitous features of brain connectivity have been identified in recent years, but their role in the brain's ability to perform concrete computations remains poorly understood. Computational neuroscience studies reveal the influence of specific brain connectivity features only on abstract dynamical properties, although the implications of real brain networks topologies on machine learning or cognitive tasks have been barely explored. Here we present a cross-species study with a hybrid approach integrating real brain connectomes and Bio-Echo State Networks, which we use to solve concrete memory tasks, allowing us to probe the potential computational implications of real brain connectivity patterns on task solving. We find results consistent across species and tasks, showing that biologically inspired networks perform as well as classical echo state networks, provided a minimum level of randomness and diversity of connections is allowed. We also present a framework, bio2art, to map and scale up real connectomes that can be integrated into recurrent ANNs. This approach also allows us to show the crucial importance of the diversity of interareal connectivity patterns, stressing the importance of stochastic processes determining neural networks connectivity in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.