Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36383507›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Modelling bark thickness for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and common oak (Quercus robur L.) with recurrent neural networks.

Dominika Cywicka, Agnieszka Jakóbik, Jarosław Socha, Daryna Pasichnyk, Adrian Widlak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominika CywickaFaculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7375-3693
Agnieszka JakóbikFaculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland.
Jarosław SochaDepartment of Forest Resources Management, Faculty of Forestry, the University of Agriculture in Krakow, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9568-5764
Daryna PasichnykDepartment of Forest Resources Management, Faculty of Forestry, the University of Agriculture in Krakow, Cracow, Poland.
Adrian WidlakFaculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9256-0061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation of the bark depends on tree age, origin, geographic location, or site conditions like temperature and water availability. Most of these variables are characterized by very high variability but above of all are also affected by climate changes. This requires the construction of improved bark thickness models that take this complexity into account. We propose a new approach based on time series. We used a recurrent neural network (ANN) to build the bark thickness model and compare it with stem taper curves adjusted to predict double bark thickness. The data includes 750 felled trees from common oak and 144 Scots pine-trees representing dominant forest-forming tree species in Europe. The trees were selected across stands varied in terms of age and site conditions. Based on the data, we built recurrent ANN and calculated bark thickness along the stem. We tested different network structures with one- and two-time window delay and three learning algorithms-Bayesian Regularization, Levenberg-Marquardt, and Scaled Conjugate Gradient. The evaluation criteria of the models were: coefficient of determination, root mean square error, mean absolute error as well as graphical analysis of observed and estimated values. The results show that recurrent ANN is a universal approach that offers the most precise estimation of bark thickness at a particular stem height. The ANN recursive model had an advantage in estimating trees that were atypical for height, as well as upper and lower parts on the stem.

Indexed as

PinusPinus sylvestrisQuercusBayes TheoremNeural Networks, ComputerPlant Bark

Identifiers

PMID36383507
PMCPMC9668195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.