Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36383492›Full record

ArticleDomain adaptation and representation transfer : 4th MICCAI Workshop, DART 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 22, 2022, proceedings. Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer (Workshop) (4th : 2022 : Sin...2022

Benchmarking and Boosting Transformers for Medical Image Classification.

DongAo Ma, Mohammad Reza Hosseinzadeh Taher, Jiaxuan Pang, Nahid Ui Islam, Fatemeh Haghighi, Michael B Gotway, Jianming Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Domain adaptation and representation transfer : 4th MICCAI Workshop, DART 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 22, 2022, proceedings. Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer (Workshop) (4th : 2022 : Sin..., 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review of multimodal machine learning approaches in healthcare.An international journal on information fusion · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Foundation Ark: Accruing and Reusing Knowledge for Superior and Robust Performance.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

DongAo MaArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Mohammad Reza Hosseinzadeh TaherArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Jiaxuan PangArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Nahid Ui IslamArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Fatemeh HaghighiArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Michael B GotwayMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
Jianming LiangArizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.

Funding

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Pulmonary EmbolismR01HL128785 · NHLBI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI LIANG, JIANMING · 2016 to 2019
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual transformers have recently gained popularity in the computer vision community as they began to outrank convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in one representative visual benchmark after another. However, the competition between visual transformers and CNNs in medical imaging is rarely studied, leaving many important questions unanswered. As the first step, we benchmark how well existing transformer variants that use various (supervised and self-supervised) pre-training methods perform against CNNs on a variety of medical classification tasks. Furthermore, given the data-hungry nature of transformers and the annotation-deficiency challenge of medical imaging, we present a practical approach for bridging the domain gap between photographic and medical images by utilizing unlabeled large-scale in-domain data. Our extensive empirical evaluations reveal the following insights in medical imaging: (1) good initialization is more crucial for transformer-based models than for CNNs, (2) self-supervised learning based on masked image modeling captures more generalizable representations than supervised models, and (3) assembling a larger-scale domain-specific dataset can better bridge the domain gap between photographic and medical images via self-supervised continuous pre-training. We hope this benchmark study can direct future research on applying transformers to medical imaging analysis. All codes and pre-trained models are available on our GitHub page https://github.com/JLiangLab/BenchmarkTransformers.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingDomain-adaptive pre-trainingTransfer learningVision Transformer

Identifiers

PMID36383492
PMCPMC9646404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.