Errors in Data Set and Effect Sizes for 1 Study Included in Meta-analysis of Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Developmental deviation in delay discounting as a transdiagnostic indicator of risk for child psychopathology.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2024
   Article
2. Errors in Text, Tables, and Figure.JAMA psychiatry · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysis.2019

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as