Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36383222›Full record

Trial reportArchives of dermatological research2023

Efficacy of a triamcinolone acetonide-loaded dissolving microneedle patch for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled split-scar study.

Wareeporn Disphanurat, Nakarin Sivapornpan, Benjaporn Srisantithum, Jeerapond Leelawattanachai

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of fractional COFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. [Thinking and prospect of scar reconstruction].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wareeporn DisphanuratDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99 Moo 18 Phaholyothin Rd., Klong Nueng, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand. dwareeporn@gmail.com.
Nakarin SivapornpanDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99 Moo 18 Phaholyothin Rd., Klong Nueng, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Benjaporn SrisantithumDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99 Moo 18 Phaholyothin Rd., Klong Nueng, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Jeerapond LeelawattanachaiNational Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Thammasat University · THNational Science and Technology Development Agency · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of hypertrophic scars (HTSs) and keloids remains a challenge. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) is the mainstay treatment for these conditions. Despite its efficacy, TAC has several adverse side effects, including telangiectasias, skin atrophy, pigmentary changes, and skin necrosis. Dissolving microneedles (DMN) use the poke-and-release method to create microchannels that enhance drug delivery to the target tissue in the dermis, without causing pain and with a decreased risk of transmission of blood-borne diseases. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of a TAC-DMN versus a drug-free DMN patch for the treatment of HTSs and keloids, 20 patients (10 with HTSs and 10 with keloids) received a split-scar treatment: one half of the scar length was treated with TAC-DMNs and the other half was treated with drug-free DMN for three sessions at 14-day intervals. Efficacy was assessed by measuring the scar volume through a multispectral imaging system and using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The HTSs treated with TAC-DMNs showed a significant reduction in the mean scar volume 2 weeks after the second treatment and 1 month after the third treatment (p = 0.028 and 0.020, respectively), while the HTSs treated with drug-free DMNs showed no significant reduction in the scar volume. Both sides of the keloids showed no significant reduction in mean scar volume. Using the POSAS, significant improvement in the appearance of both halves of the HTSs was observed 1 month after the treatments. A significant improvement (evaluated by POSAS) was also observed in the keloids treated with TAC-DMNs 2 weeks after the second treatment and 1 month after the third treatment. No significant improvement was observed from the patients' perspective as evaluated by POSAS in the keloids treated with drug-free DMNs. However, no significant difference was observed between the treatment and control halves. TAC-DMN is an effective treatment for HTSs. Increasing the dosage and duration of keloid scar treatment is required in future studies to determine whether it would result in a significant therapeutic outcome. This trial is registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20220318004; date of registration, March 17, 2022).

Indexed as

Cicatrix, HypertrophicKeloidGlucocorticoidsHumansInjections, IntralesionalTreatment OutcomeTriamcinolone AcetonideGlucocorticoidsTriamcinolone AcetonideDissolving microneedlesHypertrophic scarKeloidTriamcinolone acetonide

Identifiers

PMID36383222
OpenAlexW4309127821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.