ArticleClinical science (London, England : 1979)2022
Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD): how analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has changed prenatal diagnosis for monogenic disorders.
Article in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Prenatal Genetic Evaluation Through the Combination of Single-Gene Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening and Prenatal Imaging.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Review
- Preliminary Comparison of a Modified cfDNA Extraction Protocol for Y-Chromosome Marker Detection in Maternal Plasma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond Circulating Tumor DNA for Efficacy: Can We Use Cell-Free DNA to Detect and Monitor Toxicity Signals?JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Genetic counselors' perspectives on the expanded use of non-invasive prenatal testing.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Implementation of third-generation digital PCR for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of sickle cell disease and early detection. Pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Progress, clinical application and challenges of non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic diseases.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Universal noninvasive prenatal diagnosis for monogenic disorders using cell-free plasma DNA.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Maternal Mosaicism Challenges in Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- Article
- Performance and clinical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing for rare chromosomal abnormalities: a retrospective study of 94,125 cases.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Observational
- Cell-free placental DNA: What do we really know?PLoS genetics · 2024Review
- Early fetal sex determination using a fluorescent DNA nanosensing platform capable of simultaneous detection ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Using Circulating DNA and RNA: Advances, Challenges, and Possibilities.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023Review
- Fertility Preservation as an Option for Women with Genetic Disorders: Insights from a SWOT Analysis on Elective Oocyte Freezing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- False Positives in Brucellosis Serology: Wrong Bait and Wrong Pond?Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Review
- Article
- Clinical interpretation of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders including repeat expansion disorders: potentials and pitfalls.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) is released into the maternal circulation from trophoblastic cells during pregnancy, is detectable from 4 weeks and is representative of the entire fetal genome. The presence of this cffDNA in the maternal bloodstream has enabled clinical implementation of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) for monogenic disorders. Detection of paternally inherited and de novo mutations is relatively straightforward, and several methods have been developed for clinical use, including quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and PCR followed by restriction enzyme digest (PCR-RED) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). A greater challenge has been in the detection of maternally inherited variants owing to the high background of maternal cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Molecular counting techniques have been developed to measure subtle changes in allele frequency. For instance, relative haplotype dosage analysis (RHDO), which uses single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for phasing of high- and low-risk alleles, is clinically available for several monogenic disorders. A major drawback is that RHDO requires samples from both parents and an affected or unaffected proband, therefore alternative methods, such as proband-free RHDO and relative mutation dosage (RMD), are being investigated. cffDNA was thought to exist only as short fragments (<500 bp); however, long-read sequencing technologies have recently revealed a range of sizes up to ∼23 kb. cffDNA also carries a specific placental epigenetic mark, and so fragmentomics and epigenetics are of interest for targeted enrichment of cffDNA. Cell-based NIPD approaches are also currently under investigation as a means to obtain a pure source of intact fetal genomic DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.