Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382953›Full record

ArticleTrauma, violence & abuse2023

Sibling Experiences of Adverse Childhood Experiences: A Scoping Review.

Ben Donagh, Julie Taylor, Muna Al Mushaikhi, Caroline Bradbury-Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Research Review: Assessment of early-life adversity and trauma - cumulative risk and dimensional approaches.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Life Course Associations of Sibling Relationships and Cognitive Functioning in Late Adulthood.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben DonaghUniversity of Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2072-3903
Julie TaylorUniversity of Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-0906
Muna Al MushaikhiUniversity of Birmingham, UK.
Caroline Bradbury-JonesUniversity of Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5237-6777
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic events during childhood known to affect health and well-being across the life span. The detrimental impact ACEs have on children and young people is well-established. It is also known that 85 to 90% of children have at least one sibling. Using this as the foundation for our inquiry, the purpose of this scoping review was to understand what we currently know about the experiences of siblings living with ACEs. Sibling relationships are unique, and for some the most enduring of experiences. These relationships can be thought of as bonds held together by love and warmth; however, they can also provide scope for undesirable outcomes, such as escalation of conflicts and animosities. This scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework, complemented by the PAGER framework (Bradbury-Jones et al. 2021), offering a structured approach to the review's analysis and reporting through presenting the

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesSiblingsAdolescentChildHumansSibling Relationsadverse childhood experiencessiblingstraumaviolence and abuse

Identifiers

PMID36382953
PMCPMC10594841
OpenAlexW4309151557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.