Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382907›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2023

The Unspoken Voice: Applying John Shotter's Dialogic Lens to Qualitative Data from People Who have Communication Difficulties.

Katherine Broomfield, Karen Sage, Georgina L Jones, Simon Judge, Deborah James

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine BroomfieldDepartment of Adult Speech and Language Therapy, 374448Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7510-876X
Karen SageDepartment of Nursing, 5289Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK.
Georgina L JonesDepartment of Psychology, 4467Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Simon JudgeBarnsley Assistive Technology Team, 1519Barnsley Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, UK.
Deborah JamesFaculty of Education, 5289Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As speech and language therapists, we explored theories of communication and voice that are familiar to our profession and found them an inadequate basis on which to generate deep and rich analysis of the qualitative data from people who have communication difficulties and who use augmentative and alternative communication. Expanding our conceptual toolkit to include the work of John Shotter allowed us to reconceptualise voice and where it is emergent in dialogue. Reimaging voice will inform clinical and research praxis with people who have communication difficulties as it allows practitioners to attend more closely to the complexity and nuance inherent in interactions with this population. Our proposition is exemplified with excerpts from a single participant who has communication difficulties to illustrate the value of dialogic theory in praxis. This article presents a provocation for the wider academy of qualitative health research; do we have the concepts and tools to develop meaning with people whose lived experiences may also be hard to voice in monologues?

Indexed as

VoiceCommunicationHumansQualitative Researchaugmentative and alternative communicationdialogismqualitative researchspeech and language therapytheory

Identifiers

PMID36382907
PMCPMC9827484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.