ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2023
Reactivity to conditioned threat cues is distinct from exploratory drive in the elevated plus maze.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Psychology of Problem Finding: from the Arousal System to Cognitive Sensitivity.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026Review
- The Effects and Mechanisms of Ti-Fu-Kang Decoction in Alleviating Central Fatigue: Insights from Network Pharmacology and Metabolomics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Persistent Threat Avoidance Following Negative Reinforcement Is Not Associated with Elevated State Anxiety.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Understanding the heterogeneity of anxiety using a translational neuroscience approach.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024Review
- Dual-factor model of sleep and diet: a new approach to understanding central fatigue.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Correction to 'Reactivity to conditioned threat cues is distinct from exploratory drive in the elevated plus maze'.The European journal of neuroscience · 2023Article
- Reactivity to conditioned threat cues is distinct from exploratory drive in the elevated plus maze.The European journal of neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fear and anxiety are adaptive states that allow humans and animals alike to respond appropriately to threatening cues in their environment. Commonly used tasks for studying behaviour akin to fear and anxiety in rodent models are Pavlovian threat conditioning and the elevated plus maze (EPM), respectively. In threat conditioning the rodents learn to associate an aversive event with a specific stimulus or context. The learnt association between the two stimuli (the 'memory') can then be recalled by re-exposing the subject to the conditioned stimulus. The elevated plus maze is argued to measure the agoraphobic avoidance of the brightly lit open maze arms in crepuscular rodents. These two tasks have been used extensively, yet research into whether they interact is scarce. We investigated whether recall of an aversive memory, across contextual, odour or auditory modalities, would potentiate anxiety-like behaviour in the elevated plus maze. The data did not support that memory recall, even over a series of time points, could influence EPM behaviour. Furthermore, there was no correlation between EPM behaviour and conditioned freezing in independent cohorts tested in the EPM before or after auditory threat conditioning. Further analysis found the production of 22 kHz ultrasonic vocalisations revealed the strongest responders to a conditioned threat cue. These results are of particular importance for consideration when using the EPM and threat conditioning to identify individual differences and the possibility to use the tasks in batteries of tests without cross-task interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.