Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382836›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2023

Reactivity to conditioned threat cues is distinct from exploratory drive in the elevated plus maze.

Joe R Hilton, Susannah R Simpson, Emily R Sherman, Will Raby-Smith, Keemia Azvine, Maite Arribas, Jiaqi Zou, Serena Deiana, Bastian Hengerer, Emma N Cahill

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Zoological research · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Persistent Threat Avoidance Following Negative Reinforcement Is Not Associated with Elevated State Anxiety.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joe R HiltonDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Susannah R SimpsonDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Emily R ShermanDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Will Raby-SmithDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Keemia AzvineDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Maite ArribasDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jiaqi ZouDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Serena DeianaCNS Discovery Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Bastian HengererCNS Discovery Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Emma N CahillDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3054-1708
University of Cambridge · GBBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fear and anxiety are adaptive states that allow humans and animals alike to respond appropriately to threatening cues in their environment. Commonly used tasks for studying behaviour akin to fear and anxiety in rodent models are Pavlovian threat conditioning and the elevated plus maze (EPM), respectively. In threat conditioning the rodents learn to associate an aversive event with a specific stimulus or context. The learnt association between the two stimuli (the 'memory') can then be recalled by re-exposing the subject to the conditioned stimulus. The elevated plus maze is argued to measure the agoraphobic avoidance of the brightly lit open maze arms in crepuscular rodents. These two tasks have been used extensively, yet research into whether they interact is scarce. We investigated whether recall of an aversive memory, across contextual, odour or auditory modalities, would potentiate anxiety-like behaviour in the elevated plus maze. The data did not support that memory recall, even over a series of time points, could influence EPM behaviour. Furthermore, there was no correlation between EPM behaviour and conditioned freezing in independent cohorts tested in the EPM before or after auditory threat conditioning. Further analysis found the production of 22 kHz ultrasonic vocalisations revealed the strongest responders to a conditioned threat cue. These results are of particular importance for consideration when using the EPM and threat conditioning to identify individual differences and the possibility to use the tasks in batteries of tests without cross-task interference.

Indexed as

CuesElevated Plus Maze TestAnimalsAnxietyFearHumansMaze Learninganxietyelevated plus mazeexploratory behaviourfearmemory

Identifiers

PMID36382836
PMCPMC10107846
OpenAlexW4309124651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.