ArticleAnnals of medicine2022
Risk factors and foetal growth restriction associated with expectant treatment of early-onset preeclampsia.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Perinatal Outcomes of Third-Trimester Preeclampsia at a Tertiary Hospital in Vietnam: A Retrospective Descriptive Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Integrative Transcriptomic and Network Pharmacology Analysis Suggests Potential Mechanisms of Propofol in Early-Onset Preeclampsia.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the factors affecting expectant management of early-onset preeclampsia, and evaluate the correlation between expectant treatment and foetal growth restriction. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe retrospective study included 72 women who were admitted for early-onset preeclampsia between February 2018 to April 2021. Data included maternal clinical parameters, demographic and maternal and neonatal outcomes, which were analysed for correlation.
resultsMultiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the time interval from the onset of 24-h proteinuria to termination of pregnancy showed a strong correlation with the expectant treatment; Univariate logistic analysis confirmed that there was no correlation between expectant treatment and foetal growth restriction.
conclusionThere was a negative correlation between the duration of 24-h proteinuria and the expectant treatment of patients with early-onset preeclampsia; Expectant treatment could not improve the development of foetal growth restriction in patients with early-onset preeclampsia.KEY MESSAGESThe duration of 24-h proteinuria affects the effectiveness of expectant management of early-onset preeclampsia.Expectant management can reduce adverse neonatal outcomes due to iatrogenic preterm delivery, but it cannot improve the occurrence of foetal growth restriction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.