ReviewWaste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA2023
Environmental impact and waste recycling technologies for modern wind turbines: An overview.
Review in Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enabling Industrial Re-Use of Large-Format Additive Manufacturing Molding and Tooling.Polymers · 2025Article
- Advanced technologies for plastic waste recycling: examine recent developments in plastic waste recycling technologies.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Life Cycle Assessment to Quantify Global Warming and Human Health-Respiratory Impacts of Using Composites from Waste Wind Turbine Blades as Feedstock for Cement Clinker and Fiberglass Production.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Recyclable Wind Turbine Blades: A Life Cycle Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Life Cycle Analysis of Coaxial Layered Fiber Spinning for Wind Turbine Blade Recycling.ACS sustainable resource management · 2025Article
- Treatment and Valorization of Waste Wind Turbines: Component Identification and Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Chemical and Solvent-Based Recycling of DGEBA-Based Epoxy Thermoset and Carbon-Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composite Utilizing Imine-Containing Secondary Amine Hardener.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2025Article
- A global fairtrade partnership needed to address injustices in the supply chains of clean energy technology materials.MRS energy & sustainability : a review journal · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review on the Thermal Stability Assessment of Polymers and Composites for Aeronautics and Space Applications.Polymers · 2023Review
- The Effect of GFRP Powder on the High and Low-Temperature Properties of Asphalt Mastic.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wind power is rapidly expanding worldwide, and so is the installation of wind turbines. The concept of wind power as a clean-energy alternative will be questioned if the waste from these turbines is not and adequately controlled. The goal of this review paper is to evaluate the various approaches for end-of-life management of wind turbine blades emphasizing on fibre recovery. Different methods for recovering carbon and glass fibres are described, including thermal treatment and chemical treatments and their economic and environmental comparisons. Life cycle assessment and comparative analysis of different recycling processes are also presented. Natural composites, modified thermoset composites, and thermoplastic composites are also covered as alternative environmentally friendly blade materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.