Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382464›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2022

[Research progress of femoral neck system in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients].

Jiachen Ji, Bo Yang, Min Wang, Liang Dong, Xiaoqiang Huang

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Application of percutaneous screwdriver rod-assisted closed reduction in treatment of valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  3. [Risk factors for osteonecrosis of femoral head after femoral neck fracture fixation with femoral neck system].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiachen JiXi'an Medical University, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710068, P. R. China.
Bo YangXi'an Medical University, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710068, P. R. China.
Min WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medicine College of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710054, P. R. China.
Liang DongDepartment of Orthopedics, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medicine College of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710054, P. R. China.
Xiaoqiang HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Xi'an Fifth Hospital, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710082, P. R. China.
Xi'an Honghui Hospital · CNFirst Hospital of Xi'an · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the research progress of femoral neck system (FNS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients. Methods: The literature on FNS at home and abroad in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the results of mechanical and clinical studies on FNS were summarized based on clinical experience. Results: FNS has good mechanical stability, which can reduce complications such as femoral neck shortening, internal fixation failure, and varus caused by mechanical instability. At present, FNS is mainly selected for comparison with cannulated compression screws and dynamic hip screws in clinical research. The results show that FNS has the advantages of minimally invasive, short operation time, less intraoperative fluoroscopy, earlier postoperative weight-bearing and fracture healing, and better hip function recovery. Conclusion: As a new internal fixator, FNS has achieved satisfactory results in the current research. FNS has good mechanical advantages, which is beneficial to fracture healing and the recovery of hip joint function after operation. However, whether FNS can reduce the incidence of nonunion and osteonecrosis of the femoral head remains to be further clarified.

Indexed as

Femoral Neck FracturesBone ScrewsFemur NeckFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomefemoral neck fractureFemoral neck systeminternal fixationyoung and middle-aged adults

Identifiers

PMID36382464
PMCPMC9681595
OpenAlexW4309363367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.