Trial reportZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2022
[Automatic identification algorithm of meniscus tear based on radiomics of knee MRI].
Trial report in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To establish a classification model based on knee MRI radiomics, realize automatic identification of meniscus tear, and provide reference for accurate diagnosis of meniscus injury. Methods: A total of 228 patients (246 knees) with meniscus injury who were admitted between July 2018 and March 2021 were selected as the research objects. There were 146 males and 82 females; the age ranged from 9 to 76 years, with a median age of 53 years. There were 210 cases of meniscus injury in one knee and 18 cases in both knees. All the patients were confirmed by arthroscopy, among which 117 knees with meniscus tear and 129 knees with meniscus non-tear injury. The proton density weighted-spectral attenuated inversion recovery (PDW-SPAIR) sequence images of sagittal MRI were collected, and two doctors performed radiomics studies. The 246 knees were randomly divided into training group and testing group according to the ratio of 7∶3. First, ITK-SNAP3.6.0 software was used to extract the region of interest (ROI) of the meniscus and radiomic features. After retaining the radiomic features with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)>0.8, the max-relevance and min-redundancy (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used for filtering the features to establish an automatic identification model of meniscus tear. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) and the corresponding area under the ROC curve (AUC) was obtained; the model performance was comprehensively evaluated by calculating the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: A total of 1 316-dimensional radiomic features were extracted from the meniscus ROI, and the ICC within the group and ICC between the groups of the 981-dimensional radiomic features were both greater than 0.80. The redundant information in the 981-dimensional radiomic features was eliminated by mRMR, and the 20-dimensional radiomic features were retained. The optimal feature subset was further selected by LASSO, and 8-dimensional radiomic features were selected. The average ICC within the group and the average ICC between the groups were 0.942 and 0.920, respectively. The AUC of the training group was 0.889±0.036 [95% Conclusion: The model established by the radiomics method has good automatic identification performance of meniscus tear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.