Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382228›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Patch quality and habitat fragmentation shape the foraging patterns of a specialist folivore.

Mathew S Crowther, Adrian I Rus, Valentina S A Mella, Mark B Krockenberger, Jasmine Lindsay, Ben D Moore, Clare McArthur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Thermal Niche of the Koala (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Random Search Walks Inside Absorbing Annuli.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Patch quality and habitat fragmentation shape the foraging patterns of a specialist folivore.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mathew S CrowtherSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8968-1161
Adrian I RusSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Valentina S A MellaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Mark B KrockenbergerSydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Jasmine LindsaySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Ben D MooreHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, New South Wales 2753, Australia.
Clare McArthurSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7867-414X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on use of foraging patches has focused on why herbivores visit or quit patches, yet little is known about visits to patches over time. Food quality, as reflected by higher nutritional quality and lower plant defenses, and physical patch characteristics, which offer protection from predators and weather, affect patch use and hence should influence their revisitation. Due to the potentially high costs of moving between patches, fragmented habitats are predicted to complicate foraging decisions of many animals. We aimed to determine how food quality, shelter availability and habitat fragmentation influence tree reuse by a specialist folivore, the koala, in a fragmented agricultural landscape. We GPS-tracked 23 koalas in northern New South Wales, Australia and collated number of revisits, average residence time, and average time-to-return to each tree. We measured tree characteristics including food quality (foliar nitrogen and toxic formylated phloroglucinol compounds, FPCs concentrations), tree size, and tree connectedness. We also modeled the costs of locomotion between trees. Koalas re-visited isolated trees with high leaf nitrogen disproportionately often. They spent longer time in trees with high leaf nitrogen, and in large trees used for shelter. They took longer to return to trees with low leaf nitrogen. Tree connectivity reduced travel costs between patches, being either individual or groups of trees. FPC levels had no detectable effect on patch revisitation. We conclude that food quality and shelter drive koala tree re-visits. Scattered, isolated trees with nutrient-rich leaves are valuable resource patches for koalas despite movement costs to reach them.

Identifiers

PMID36382228
PMCPMC9639584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.