Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382212›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2022

Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches for Dental Age Assessment in Sub Adult Portuguese Population: European Regression Formula and Demirjian Stages.

Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Carla Belo, Joana Sardinha, Rui Santos, Francisco Salvado, Roberto Cameriere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristiana Palmela PereiraFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9164-7189
Carla BeloStudent of Postgraduate Specialisation Course, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-5186
Joana SardinhaStudent of Postgraduate Specialisation Course, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4129-6496
Rui SantosDepartment of Mathematics, School of Technology and Management, Polytechnic of Leiria, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7371-363X
Francisco SalvadoCentre of Statistics and Applications, Faculty of Medicine of University of Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-8090
Roberto CameriereAge Estimation Project, FOR.MED.LAB, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-2244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Over the last decade, the criminal justice system among the European countries deals with a new group of people, the undocumented people. In the criminal field, most of the suspected claimed to be under the minor legal age according to the type of crime. The government of each European country is committed to protecting the children and vulnerable people. There are serious safety concerns since adults falsely claim to be minors and legal systems oppose to such claims. In this study, we have used different age assessment methods and some of them without accuracy. Objective: To meet the general considerations we developed a study using the current dental age assessment methods. Hence, for the Portuguese population, this study aims to validate the European regression formula between the ages of 6 and 15 years of age; to estimate the cut-off point for the age of 12 years, and to compare the quantitative approach of European regression formula with Demirjian's qualitative approach for age estimation. Material and Methods: 483 orthopantomograms were analysed using the European formula and Demirjian scoring stages. A new method, Model 2, was designed to better suit the Portuguese population. Results: The European formula: average age underestimation of 4.88 for the third quadrant and 4.04 months for the fourth quadrant; and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 10.93 and 10.68 months respectively. Demirjian method: average overestimation of 8.70 months, MAE of 12.85 months. In Model 2: MAE of 9.37 months for the third quadrant, and 9.28 months for the fourth quadrant. Both European formula and Demirjian method had an area under ROC curves results above 0.93. Discrepancy of sensitivity between methods for the specific cut-off point: 11.48. The results obtained in this study can be extrapolated to 87.33% of the Portuguese population. Conclusions: The European regression formula can be applied for the Portuguese population, and seems to be more accurate than Demirjian's methodology in this population. Nevertheless, both European regression formula and Demirjian method present similarly suitable results in the classification of 12 years of age, although there is a noticeable discrepancy favouring the European regression formula. The European Formula when applied for criminal age assessment, independently of population, is mandatory to indicate to the judicial institutions, the sensitivity of the results.

Indexed as

Author Keywords: Regression AnalysisForensic DentistryLaw EnforcementMeSH Terms: Age Determination by TeethRefugeesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID36382212
PMCPMC9635504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.