ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
Creating patient-specific vein models to characterize wall shear stress in hemodialysis population.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Vein Attempt? Experimental Models for Arteriovenous Fistula Research.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Review
- Fluid-structure interaction in a follow-up study of arterio-venous fistula maturation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients require arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) that allow a mature vein to withstand hemodialysis. Unfortunately, venous thrombosis and stenosis in the cephalic vein arch after AVF placement is common and heavily influenced by hemodynamics. To better assess forces and flow behavior in the cephalic arch, we have built patient-specific millifluidic models that allow us to explore the complex interplay between patient-specific vein geometry and fluctuating hemodynamics. These 3D models were created from patient-specific intravascular ultrasound and venogram images obtained three- and twelve-months post AVF creation and fabricated into soft elastomer-based millifluidic devices. Geometric validation of fabricated phantom millifluidic device shows successful replication of original computational 3D model. Millifluidic devices were perfused with a blood-mimicking fluid containing fluorescent tracer beads under steady-state physiologic cephalic vein flow conditions (20 mL/min). Particle image velocimetry was employed to calculate wall shear stress (WSS) across the cephalic arches. Experimental WSS profile evaluation reveals that the physiologic cephalic arch model yields WSS values within physiologic range [76-760 mPa]. Moreover, upon comparing WSS profiles across all models, it is noticeable that WSS values increase as vein diameter decreases, which further supports employed experimental and analysis strategy. The presented millifluidic devices show promise for experimental WSS characterization under pathologic flow conditions to contrast from calculated physiologic hemodynamics and better understand WSS influence on thrombosis and stenosis in hemodialysis patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.