ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
A systematic mapping study on machine learning techniques for the prediction of CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA target cleavage.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transitioning from wet lab to artificial intelligence: a systematic review of AI predictors in CRISPR.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- gRNA Design: How Its Evolution Impacted on CRISPR/Cas9 Systems Refinement.Biomolecules · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9 technology has greatly accelerated genome engineering research. The CRISPR/Cas9 complex, a bacterial immune response system, is widely adopted for RNA-driven targeted genome editing. The systematic mapping study presented in this paper examines the literature on machine learning (ML) techniques employed in the prediction of CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA on/off-target cleavage, focusing on improving support in sgRNA design activities and identifying areas currently being researched. This area of research has greatly expanded recently, and we found it appropriate to work on a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS), an investigation that has proven to be an effective secondary study method. Unlike a classic review, in an SMS, no comparison of methods or results is made, while this task can instead be the subject of a systematic literature review that chooses one theme among those highlighted in this SMS. The study is illustrated in this paper. To the best of the authors' knowledge, no other SMS studies have been published on this topic. Fifty-seven papers published in the period 2017-2022 (April, 30) were analyzed. This study reveals that the most widely used ML model is the convolutional neural network (CNN), followed by the feedforward neural network (FNN), while the use of other models is marginal. Other interesting information has emerged, such as the wide availability of both open code and platforms dedicated to supporting the activity of researchers or the fact that there is a clear prevalence of public funds that finance research on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.