Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36382027›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2022

Prevalence and factors associated with tobacco use among beneficiaries attending the youth mental health promotion clinics (Yuvaspandana Kendra) in India: A case-record analysis.

Gautham M Sukumar, Pradeep Banandur, Vaishali Dagar, Shubhi Nema, Sathya R Velu, Arvind Banavaram, Vani Naik, Virupaksha Gangappa, Mutharaju Arelingaiah, Lavanya Garady and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Nicotine prevalence among youth of rural Jaipur, Rajasthan.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gautham M SukumarDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.
Pradeep BanandurDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.
Vaishali DagarDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.
Shubhi NemaDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.
Sathya R VeluDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.
Arvind BanavaramDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.
Vani NaikDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.
Virupaksha GangappaDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.
Mutharaju ArelingaiahDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.
Lavanya GaradyInternational Centre for Public Health Innovations, M. S. Ramaiah, Karnataka, India.
Subhash C LakshminarayanDepartment of Youth Empowerment and Sports, Government of Karnataka, Karnataka, India.
Shalini RajneeshDepartment of Youth Empowerment and Sports, Government of Karnataka, Karnataka, India.
Gururaj GopalkrishnaDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChewing tobacco and smoking among youth leads to poor health outcomes. Understanding the factors associated with chewing tobacco and smoking is thus important for interventions.

methodsA case-record analysis among 10340 youth (aged 15-35 years) attending a unique mental health promotion program, Yuva Spandana, across the state of Karnataka in southern India, was performed to assess prevalence of chewing tobacco and smoking. Multiple logistic regression was applied to determine the factors associated with their use.

resultsOverall, the prevalence of chewing tobacco and smoking among beneficiaries was 3% and 2.1%, respectively. The risk of tobacco chewing and smoking increased with age and risk was higher among males, married individuals and among all occupational categories, other than students. Adjusted odds ratios of chewing tobacco were found to be highest among business/salaried beneficiaries (AOR=3.48; 95% CI: 2.27-5.34), followed by ever married beneficiaries (AOR=3.41; 95% CI: 1.27-9.17). Adjusted odds ratios of smoking tobacco were highest among males (AOR=12.89; 95% CI: 7.5-22.14), followed by emotional experience of feeling worthless (AOR=4.19; 95% CI: 2.78-6.32), beneficiaries with poor relationship with family members (AOR=3.79; 95% CI: 1.38-10.44), and business/salaried beneficiaries (AOR=2.90; 95% CI: 1.79-4.7). Strength of association of males with smoking was much higher (AOR=12.89; 95% CI: 7.5-22.14) than compared with chewing tobacco (AOR=2.49; 95% CI: 1.89-3.28).

conclusionsEarly identification of these factors associated with chewing tobacco and smoking will help in focusing on youth specific health promotion and interventions to improve their overall health and wellbeing.

Indexed as

chewing tobaccomental healthsmokingsubstance useyouth

Identifiers

PMID36382027
PMCPMC9608783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.